Environmental Protection in International Investment: Balancing with Investor Interests

Authors

  • Maomao Qin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/qdanmy77

Keywords:

International Investment Agreements (IIAs); environmental protection in host countries; environmental responsibility of international investors.

Abstract

Based on the natural vulnerability of the investor in the host country, early ISDS favored the protection of the investor in the Investment interests of host countries. However, as countries pay attention to their domestic environmental interests and national environmental awareness has increased, they have become more aware of the need to protect the environment. The conflict between the host country's environmental protection measures and the interests of foreign investors is undoubtedly a serious challenge to the existing international investment arbitration regime. This essay firstly describes the investor protection clauses in IIAs; secondly, it analyses the conflict between environmental protection and investor rights and interests, describes IIAs between environmental protection and investor rights and interests, and researches and analyses specific dispute cases. Then it analyses how to better balance and coordinate the relationship between investment protection and the host country's right to environmental regulation from the three perspectives of the host country, home country and cross-border investors. Finally, it proposes measures to better balance environmental protection and investor rights from the perspective of IIAs and green investor responsibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arcuri, Alessandra, and Federica Violi. Public Interest and International Investment Law: A Critical Perspective on Three Mainstream Narratives. Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021:1-27.

Neumayer E. Greening trade and investment: environmental protection without protectionism. Routledge, 2017.

Zeng, Huaqun. Co-development: innovations in investment treaty practice between China and 'Belt and Road' countries. Journal of International Economic Law, 2019,1: 1-33.

Eiser Infrastructure Limited and Energía Solar Luxembourg S.à r.l. v. Kingdom of Spain, [2013] ICSID Case No. ARB/13/36.

Fecak T. International investment agreements and EU law. Kluwer Law International BV, 2016.

Du, Tao. The Competing Issues of Local Litigation and International Arbitration in Investor-State Dispute Settlement from the Case of Hailer Siazer v. China. Collection, 2019,3:78-91.

China-ASEAN Investment Agreement (CAIA), s 3(2).

Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, s 9(7).

Kathryn Gordon, and Joachim Pohl, Environmental Concerns in International Investment Agreements: a survey (OECD 2011)

Bian Yongmin. Trade and environmental protection rules constructed by the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. ETLR, 2019,4:27-64.

Colombia - Japan BIT (2011).

China - United Republic of Tanzania BIT, 2013.

The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), 2020.

China - Japan - Korea, Republic of Trilateral Investment Agreement, 2012.

Myer P G. IXTOC I: Case study of a major oil spill.1984.

Copeland, B.R. and Taylor M.S. North-South Trade and the Environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2009,109: 755-769.

Data from Greenpeace official website, http://www.greenpeace.org.cn/publications/report-of-survey/

Han Xiu Li. Environmental protection in China's Overseas Investment. Research on international issues, 2013,5: 103.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2023

How to Cite

Qin, M. (2023). Environmental Protection in International Investment: Balancing with Investor Interests. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 24, 607-613. https://doi.org/10.54097/qdanmy77