The Constitution of China’s Role Identity as a Responsible Major Power: Exploring International Interactions and Domestic Ethical Notions

Authors

  • Yuening Du

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/8xt6cm08

Keywords:

China, major power, role identity.

Abstract

As a member of the international society, China, along with other state actors, international organizations, non-governmental organizations and transnational corporations, actively assumes its corresponding responsibilities. This paper explores the constitution of China’s role identity as a “responsible major power”, a significant yet relatively unexplored topic. Employing the sociological theoretical framework of identity theory, the paper transcends traditional constructivist theories and examines how expectations linked to China’s role as “responsible major power” are generated and fulfilled. This involves interactions with other international actors in international institutions and the influence of traditional domestic notions. The paper highlights that China’s behaviors align with a “responsible major power” and have effectively disseminated associated values and beliefs, albeit with varying levels of acceptance from its role partners. Moreover, China’s perception this role identity is also influenced by “Tianxia” notion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gülseven, Y. (2020). ‘Aid with Chinese Characteristics’: Competitive and/or complementary? The Pacific Review, 1-25.

Kobayashi, K. et al. (2022) Pathways to Socialisation: China, Russia, and Competitive Norm Socialisation in a Changing Global Order. Review of international studies. [Online] 48 (3), 560–582.

Lee, J. (2010) China Won’t Be a ‘Responsible Stakeholder’; Washington Needs to Revise its Approach to Managing the Rise of the Middle Kingdom. The Wall Street Journal. Eastern edition.

Ikenberry, GJ (2001) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Stets, J. E. & Burke, P. J. (2000) Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quarterly. [Online] 63 (3), 224–237.

Security Council, resolution 495 (1981): on renewal of the mandate of the UN Peace-keeping Force in Cyprus. [Online] Available at: <https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/26750> [Accessed 27 August 2023].

The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China, 2020. China’s Armed Forces: 30 Years of UN Peacekeeping Operations.

Department of Regional Openness, 2020. Belt and Road Initiative Creates Remarkable Achievements. [Online] Available at: <https://en.ndrc.gov.cn/netcoo/achievements/202105/t20210526_1280919.html> [Accessed 27 August 2023].

Gilpin, S. I. (2023) China, Africa and the International Aid System: A Challenge to (the Norms Underpinning) the Neoliberal World Order? Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden). [Online] 58 (3), 277–297.

Jones, K., 2023. The Belt and Road Initiative: China’s Strategy to Bring Nations around the World into its Orbit. [Online] Available at: <https://alec.org/article/the-belt-and-road-initiative-chinas-strategy-to-bring-nations-around-the-world-into-its-orbit/#:~:text=Launched%20in%202013%20by%20China%E2% 80%99s%20President%20Xi%20Jinping%2C,estimates%20ranging%20from%20%241%20trillion%20to%20%248%20trillion.>[Accessed 27 August 2023].

Addis, A. K. et al. (2021) Chinese and Indian investment in Ethiopia: infrastructure for ‘debt-trap diplomacy’ exchange and the land grabbing approach. International journal of emerging markets. [Online] 16 (6), 998–1025.

World Economic Forum, 2022. Growing Intra-African Trade through Digital Transformation of Border and Customs Services: Regional Action Group for Africa. [pdf] Available at: <https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Regional_Action_Group_for_Africa_2022.pdf>[Accessed 30 August 2023].

China Daily, 2023. Kenya's top UN envoy lauds ties with China. [Online] Available at: <https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202307/17/WS64b419c4a31035260b816af4.html>[Accessed 30 August 2023].

China Daily, 2023. Kenya's UN representative: China 'debt trap' talk inaccurate. [Online] Available at: <https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202307/12/WS64adff38a31035260b815ecd.html>[Accessed 30 August 2023].

Kavalski, E. (2013). The struggle for recognition of normative powers: Normative power Europe and normative power China in context. Cooperation and Conflict, 48 (2), 247-267.

ASEAN, 2019. Co-chairs’ Summary Report 7th ARF Peacekeeping Experts’ Meeting. [pdf] Available at: <https://aseanregionalforum.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Final_Cleant-Text_Co_Chairs_ Summary_Report-2.pdf>[Accessed 1 September 2023].

Chan, L. H. (2020). Can China Remake Regional Order? Contestation With India over the Belt and Road Initiative. Global Change, Peace & Security, 1-19.

Han, D. G. X. (2017) China’s Normative Power in Managing South China Sea Disputes. The Chinese journal of international politics. [Online] 10 (3), 269–297.

Mencius, The Works of Mencius, translated by Legge, J.. [Online] Available at: <http://nothingistic.org/library/mencius/mencius26.html>[Accessed 26 August 2023].

Xunzi, Xunzi: The Complete Text, Eric L. Hutton (tr.), Princeton University Press, 2014, xxxi+ 397pp.

Zhao, T. Y., 2019. Redefining A Philosophy for World Governance. Singapore: Palgave Macmillan.

Dreyer, J. T. (2015) The ‘Tianxia Trope’: will China change the international system? The Journal of contemporary China. [Online] 24 (96), 1015–1031.

Mankoff, J. 2022. Sinocentrism and the Geopolitics of Tianxia. Empires of Eurasia: How Imperial Legacies Shape International Security. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 251-268. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300265378-015.

Babones, S. (2020) From Tianxia to Tianxia: The Generalization of a Concept. Chinese political science review. [Online] 5 (2), 131–147.

Česnakas, G. (2022) The Collective Imagination and the Limitations for the Tianxia to Replace the Westphalian World Order. Politologija - Vilniaus Universitetas. [Online] 105 (1), 133–166.

Cranmer-Byng, J. (1973) The Chinese View of Their Place in the World: An Historical Perspective. The China quarterly (London). [Online] 53 (53), 67–79.

Park, J. M. & Wang, C.-P. (2020) Interpreting the Maritime and Overland Trade Regulations of 1882 between Chosŏn and the Qing: How logics of appropriateness shaped Sino–Korean relations. International area studies review. [Online] 23 (1), 114–132.

Elleman, B. A. (2019) “Sino-French War (1884–85),” in The Making of the Modern Chinese Navy. Anthem Press, pp. 35–38.

Sun Yat-sen, 1924. San Min Chu I, The Three Principles of The People. [pdf] Available at: <https://chinese.larouchepub.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/San-Min-Chu-I_ALL-en.pdf>[Accessed 26 August 2023].

Gregor, A. J. (1981) Confucianism and the Political Thought of Sun Yat-Sen. Philosophy east & west. [Online] 31 (1), 55–70.

Ikenberry, G., 2015. Between the Eagle and the Dragon: America, China, and Middle State Strategies in East Asia. Political Science Quarterly, 131 (1), pp.9-43.

Downloads

Published

01-04-2024

How to Cite

Du, Y. (2024). The Constitution of China’s Role Identity as a Responsible Major Power: Exploring International Interactions and Domestic Ethical Notions. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 28, 67-74. https://doi.org/10.54097/8xt6cm08