Factors Leading to Underestimation and Devaluation of Female Leaderships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/tabfc675Keywords:
Female leaderships; Gender stereotypes.Abstract
In contemporary society, the underestimation of female leaderships within organizations and the concerning gender inequality gap in workplaces remain as significant issues. This study delves into the intricate web of factors leading to the underestimation of female leadership, examining both external factors, including the Role Congruity Theory, the Glass Cliff phenomenon and the “Think crisis – Think Female” Model, and internal factors including internalization of gender stereotypes by females. The research methodology used is primarily analyzing existing articles and literature. This study offers valuable suggestions for addressing these challenges, suggesting actions by multiple stakeholders including companies, women workers, and society as a whole. In conclusion, the research has illuminated that there are three crucial theoretical factors interplaying and ultimately contributing to the underestimation of female leadership, including external influences like the Role Congruity Theory, the Glass Cliff phenomenon and the “Think crisis – Think Female” Model, as well as internal factors such as gender stereotype internalization.
Downloads
References
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573
Hoobler J. M., Wayne S. J., Lemmon G. Bosses’ perceptions of family-work conflict and women’s promotability: Glass ceiling effects. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 939-957, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.44633700
Klein F. B., Chaigneau P., Devers C. E. CEO gender-based termination concerns: Evidence from initial severance agreements. Journal of Management, 47: 567-596, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319887421
Wang J. C., Markóczy L., Sun S. L., Peng M. W. She’-EO compensation gap: A role congruity view. Journal of Business Ethics, 159: 745-760, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3807-4
Bigelow L., Lundmark L., Parks J., Wuebker R. Skirting the issues: Experimental evidence of gender bias in IPO prospectus evaluations. Journal of Management, 40: 1732-1759, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312441624
Tang S., Nadkarni S., Wei L., Zhang S. X. Balancing the yin and yang: TMT gender diversity, psychological safety, and firm ambidextrous strategic orientation in Chinese high-tech SMEs. Academy of Management Journal, 64: 1578-1604, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.0378
Uzuegbunam I., Pathak S., Taylor-Bianco A., Ofem B. How cultural tightness interacts with gender in founding teams: Insights from the commercialization of social ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 36: Article 106127, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106127
del Carmen Triana, M., Song, R., Um, C. T., & Huang, L. Stereotypical Perception in Management: A Review and Expansion of Role Congruity Theory. Journal of Management, 0(0), 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231180836
van Gils, S., Van Quaquebeke, N., Borkowski, J., & van Knippenberg, D. Respectful leadership: Reducing performance challenges posed by leader role incongruence and gender dissimilarity. Human Relations, 71(12), 1590-1610, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718754992
Laurie A. Rudman, Corinne A. Moss-Racusin, Julie E. Phelan, Sanne Nauts, Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 165-179, ISSN 0022-1031, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008
Abele, A. E., Bruckmüller, S. The bigger one of the “Big Two”? Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 935–948, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.028
Brenner, S., Solal, I., & Wernicke, G. ‘not my CEO’: Employee reactions to the threat of female leadership. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2023(1), 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2023.103bp
Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over‐represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 81-90, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00433.x
Kulich C, Gartzia L, Komarraju M, Aelenei C. Contextualizing the think crisis-think female stereotype in explaining the glass cliff: Gendered traits, gender, and type of crisis. PLOS ONE 16(3): e0246576, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246576
Ryan, M.K., Haslam, S.A., Hersby, M.D., Bongiorno, R. Think crisis–think female: Glass cliffs and contextual variation in the think manager–think male stereotype. J Appl Psychol, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022133
Piazza, K.S., Diaz, G. Light in the midst of chaos: COVID-19 and female political representation. World Dev. 2020 Dec;136:105125, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105125
Lopez, E. S., & Ensari, N. The effects of leadership style, organizational outcome, and gender on attributional bias toward leaders. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(2), 19–37, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21326
Bisgaard, M. Bias will find a way: Economic perceptions, attributions of blame, and partisan-motivated reasoning during crisis. The Journal of Politics, 77(3), 849–860, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/681591
Galsanjigmed, E.; Sekiguchi, T. Challenges Women Experience in Leadership Careers: An Integrative Review. Merits 2023, 3, 366-389, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/merits3020021
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
