A Study on The Current Status of Electronic Evidence Preservation in Internet Crime
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/reykxj59Keywords:
Cybercrime; Electronic Evidence; Blockchain.Abstract
This article focuses on the electronic evidence related to internet crime, exploring legal systems related to electronic evidence and legal issues related to information technology. The paper discusses the concept and characteristics of electronic evidence in internet crime, analyzes the relevant technologies and legal systems used for preserving electronic evidence in China, and highlights potential issues. Furthermore, a comparative legal study is conducted, examining the electronic evidence rules in the Anglo-American legal system and the Continental legal system, with reference to judicial cases in Japan and the United States. This analysis emphasizes the similarities and differences in electronic evidence rules and admissibility criteria. Finally, the paper proposes strategies to address the challenges faced in electronic evidence preservation in China from both a technological and systemic perspective. By addressing the arguments above, this article holds theoretical and practical significance in enhancing the legal framework and standardizing electronic evidence practices in China.
Downloads
References
Hong Dongying. General Introduction to Civil Procedure Law. Peking University Press, 2020.
Zhu Chenyang. Review of the Admission and Admissibility of Electronic Evidence in Civil Litigation. Shanghai Law Research Collection 2023, Volume 10 - Anthology of Chinese Excellent Traditional Legal Culture. Shanghai Law Society, 2023:126-135.
Pei Zhaobin. On the mode of electronic data forensics in criminal proceedings. Oriental Law, 2014(05):87-95.
Liu Baochen. On the Rules of Electronic Data Evidence in Criminal Proceedings, 2022(06).
Lund, Paul. An investigators’ Approach to Digital Evidence. Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, 2009,06: 220-222.
Chen Jian. Study on legal issues of electronic evidence collection. Hebei University of Economics and Business, 2020(05):13-14.
Qiu Aimin. Study onthe System of Authentication of Physical Evidence. Beijing Intellectual Property Press, 2013:132.
Esler, Brian W. Lorraine v Markel: Unnecessarily Raising the Standard for Admissibility of Electronic Evidence. Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, 2007, 04: 80-82.
Kaneko, Hironao. "Electronic Evidence in Civil Procedure in Japan." Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, 2008,05: 211-213.
Xu Ronghong. Research on electronic evidence storage technology based on blockchain. North China University of Technology, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.