Analysis On the Criminal Jurisdiction Path of Foreign-Related Cybercrime from The Perspective of Transnational Telecom Fraud

Authors

  • Fei Wang
  • Tianqi Zheng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hvvby487

Keywords:

Criminal jurisdiction; Foreign-related cyber crimes; Principle of universal jurisdiction; Theory of real harm connection; Aiding the offender.

Abstract

In today's era of advanced science and technology and rapid development of big data Internet, China's online telecom fraud shows the characteristics of transnational behavior or result, collectivization of criminal organization structure, diversification of crime methods, ganging of people involved and internationalization of cybercrime connection points. When Internet telecom fraud crimes occur from abroad to China, the research on whether China has jurisdiction over other countries and how to determine jurisdiction is of great benefit to building an effective information framework to combat crimes, actively accelerating the pace of international cooperation, effectively coordinating jurisdiction conflicts, and continuously strengthening the ability of domestic judicial organs to perform their duties. Therefore, this paper will start with the criminal jurisdiction of foreign-related cyber crimes from the perspective of transnational telecom fraud, and actively explore the correct way to determine the criminal jurisdiction of foreign-related cyber crimes in China by using the methods of literature research and comparative research. This paper starts with an all-round overview of telecom fraud, and then studies its essence and characteristics in the dimension of transnational telecom fraud. The theoretical basis and existing difficulties of the exercise of criminal jurisdiction over transnational telecommunication network crimes are summarized in two parts. This paper expounds the dilemma of the exercise of criminal jurisdiction, and finally gives some suggestions on the exercise of criminal jurisdiction over foreign-related cybercrime in China according to the above problems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Li Li. Research on Several Issues of Telecommunication Fraud Crime. Lanzhou University, 2018.

Yichao Gao. Countermeasures Research on Punishing and Preventing Telecommunication Fraud Crimes. Tianjin University, 2018.

Tianshui Zhao. Criminal Jurisdiction of Foreign Cybercrime. Journal of Jiangsu Police College, 2023, 38(03): 34-42.

Zhigang Yu. Reflections on Criminal Jurisdiction in Cyberspace. Chinese Jurisprudence, 2003,6.

Tianshi. Comparative study of criminal universal jurisdiction legislation. Journal of Chongqing Three Gorges College, 2023.

Zhang Ting, Chen Li. Application Dilemma and Solution of Criminal Jurisdiction in Transnational Cybercrime. Journal of Central South University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition).

Yu Su. Conflict and Resolution of Transnational Cybercrime Jurisdiction. East China University of Politics and Law, 2021.

Dongjie Han. On National Criminal Jurisdiction Conflicts and Their Resolution. Shenyang University of Technology,2018.

Ting Tan,Le Yue,Xianmin Li. Determination of Criminal Jurisdiction for Foreign-Related Cybercrime. People's Procuratorate, 2018(07): 62-65.

Qiang Meng. Study on the Conviction and Sentencing of Helping Offenders of Telecommunication Network Fraud Common Crimes. Journal of Wuhan Public Security Cadre College, 2018, 32(01): 60-62.

Olawale Surajudeen Adebayo, Joshua Bulus Micah, Ganiyu Shefiu Olusegun, et al. Development of Secure Electronic Cybercrime Cases Database System for the Judiciary.

Veena K., Meena K., Kuppusamy Ramya, Teekaraman Yuvaraja, et al. Cybercrime: Identification and Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques.

Downloads

Published

01-04-2024

How to Cite

Wang, F., & Zheng , T. (2024). Analysis On the Criminal Jurisdiction Path of Foreign-Related Cybercrime from The Perspective of Transnational Telecom Fraud. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 28, 549-557. https://doi.org/10.54097/hvvby487