The Influence of Generative AI Technologies On Academic Writing in EFL Education

Authors

  • Chuan Tian

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/xv0rbq11

Keywords:

Generative Artificial Intelligence; ChatGPT; acadmic writing; English-as-a-foreign-language education.

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has emerged as a power to transform academic writing courses, especially in the English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) field, offering innovative tools and methodologies that can reshape pedagogical practices. Through a comprehensive exploration, this paper discusses the development of GAI technologies, their applications in natural language processing, and their potential to revolutionize academic writing support. The paper then examines the integration of GAI tools into EFL academic writing pedagogy, showing its benefits for both students and educators. However, the use of GAI is not without challenges. Concerns surrounding academic integrity, potential for plagiarism, data privacy, and the ethical implications of GAI tools underscore the complexities of this integration. Drawing from various studies, this paper argues that responsible advancement of GAI requires a balance between innovation and ethics. Stakeholders must consider potential implications. A measured approach is advocated for future work in related fields.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

F. J. García‐Peñalvo and A. Vázquez-Ingelmo, “What Do We Mean by GenAI? A Systematic Mapping of The Evolution, Trends, and Techniques Involved in Generative AI,” International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. In Press, no. In Press, p. 1, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.9781/ijimai.2023.07.006.

K. Knill and S. Young, “Hidden Markov models in speech and language processing,” in Text, speech and language technology, 1997, pp. 27–68. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-1183-8_2.

D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, “Auto-Encoding variational Bayes,” arXiv (Cornell University), Dec. 2013, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114.

I. Goodfellow et al., “Generative Adversarial Nets,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 27, pp. 1–9, Oct. 2014.

T. Mikolov, M. Karafiát, L. Burget, J. Cernocký, and S. Khudanpur, “Recurrent neural network based language model,” Interspeech, vol. 2, pp. 1045–1048, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.21437/interspeech.2010-343.

U. Khandelwal, H. He, P. Qi, and D. Jurafsky, “Sharp Nearby, Fuzzy Far Away: How Neural Language Models Use Context,” arXiv, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.18653/v1/p18-1027.

A. Vaswani et al., “Attention is All you Need,” arXiv (Cornell University), vol. 30, pp. 5998–6008, Jun. 2017, [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.03762v5

A. Radford, K. Narasimhan, T. Salimans, and I. Sutskever, Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. 2018.

OpenAI, “GPT-4 Technical Report,” arXiv (Cornell University), Mar. 2023, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2303.08774.

A. Nenkova and K. McKeown, “Automatic summarization,” Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 103–233, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1561/1500000015.

R. Gozalo-Brizuela and E. C. Garrido-Merchán, “A survey of Generative AI Applications,” arXiv (Cornell University), Jun. 2023, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2306.02781.

W. Medhat, A. Hassan, and H. Korashy, “Sentiment analysis algorithms and applications: A survey,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1093–1113, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2014.04.011.

W. J. Hutchins, “Machine Translation: A Brief history,” in Elsevier eBooks, 1995, pp. 431–445. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-042580-1.50066-0.

S. C. Siu, “Revolutionizing Translation with AI: Unravelling Neural Machine Translation and Generative Pre-trained Large Language Models,” SSRN, Jul. 04, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4499768 (accessed Sep. 27, 2023).

P. P. Ray, “ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope,” Internet of Things and Cyber-physical Systems, vol. 3, pp. 121–154, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003.

M. Campbell, “Teaching academic writing in higher education,” Education Quarterly Reviews, vol. 2, no. 3, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.31014/aior.1993.02.03.92.

T. Wang et al., “Exploring the Potential Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on International Students in Higher Education: Generative AI, Chatbots, Analytics, and International Student Success,” Applied Sciences, May 2023, doi: 10.20944/preprints202305. 0808.v1.

W. M. Lim, A. Gunasekara, J. L. Pallant, J. Pallant, and E. Pechenkina, “Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 100790, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790.

Y. Dong, “Revolutionizing Academic English Writing through AI-Powered Pedagogy: Practical Exploration of Teaching Process and Assessment,” Journal of Higher Education Research, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 52, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.32629/jher. v4i2.1188.

J. Reyna, “The potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and ChatGPT for teaching, learning and research,” ResearchGate, Jun. 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371310638_The_Potential_of_Artificial_Intelligence_AI_and_ChatGPT_for_Teaching_Learning_and_Research

C. K. Y. Chan and W. Hu, “Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 1, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8.

Y. Su, Y. G. Lin, and C. Lai, “Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms,” Assessing Writing, vol. 57, p. 100752, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752.

C. Liu, J. Hou, Y.-F. Tu, Y. Wang, and G. Hwang, “Incorporating a reflective thinking promoting mechanism into artificial intelligence-supported English writing environments,” Interactive Learning Environments, pp. 1–19, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2021.2012812.

O. Koraishi, “Teaching English in the Age of AI: Embracing ChatGPT to Optimize EFL Materials and Assessment,” Language Education & Technology (LET Journal), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 55–72, May 2023.

J.-Y. Han et al., “RECIPE: How to Integrate ChatGPT into EFL Writing Education,” arXiv, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1145/3573051.3596200.

J.-Y. Han et al., “CHEDDAR: Student-ChatGPT Dialogue in EFL Writing Education,” arXiv (Cornell University), Sep. 2023, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2309.13243.

M. Sullivan, A. Kelly, and P. Mclaughlan, “ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning,” Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, vol. 6, no. 1, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17.

D. Yan, “Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation,” Education and Information Technologies, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4.

Z. Bahroun, C. Anane, V. Ahmed, and A. Zacca, “Transforming Education: A Comprehensive Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Settings through Bibliometric and Content Analysis,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 17, p. 12983, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151712983.

Downloads

Published

01-04-2024

How to Cite

Tian, C. (2024). The Influence of Generative AI Technologies On Academic Writing in EFL Education. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 28, 575-584. https://doi.org/10.54097/xv0rbq11