Balancing Effective Visual Communication and Anti-Stereotype in Women’s Empowerment Visuals

Authors

  • Cyrilla Cao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/80fptw50

Keywords:

Visual communication, stereotype, gender nonconformity, women’s empowerment.

Abstract

Visuals have been increasingly preferred as a means for advocating for feminism. Visual content creators with such ends design visual content in particular ways to attract and create resonance with female audiences. However, in doing so, visual creators may be contributing to the social construction of “female”, potentially undermining their efforts. The current study provides an explanation of the components of effective visual communication and anti-gender stereotypes, identifies their connection and a dilemma for visual creators, and suggests possible solutions as to how to balance the two. There is no one solution that is capable of solving the problem entirely, and the efficacy of the solutions varies based on the particular visual communication method and/or the circumstances and viewpoint of the affected group, indicating the necessity for customized approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Subramanian K. Myth and Mystery of Shrinking Attention Span. International Journal of Trend in Research and Development, 2018, 5(3): 2394–9333.

Iyer G, Katona Z. Competing for Attention in Social Communication Markets. Management Science, 2016, 62(8): 2304-2320.

Vogel D, Dickson J, Lehman J A. Persuasion and the Role of Visual Presentation Support: The UM/3M Study. 1986.

Xu H, Tan Y. Can Beauty Advertisements Empower Women? A Critical Discourse Analysis of the SK-II’s ‘Change Destiny’ Campaign. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2020, 10(2), 176.

World Health Organization. Gender and health. World Health Organization, 2019.

Schill D. The Visual Image and the Political Image: A Review of Visual Communication Research in the Field of Political Communication. Review of Communication, 2012, 12(2), 118-142.

Kelly V. Bridging the gap: resonance in visual communication design. ACUADS 2008 Conference: Sites of activity/On the Edge, 2008, 1-12.

Brooks C, Gardner J, Chen K. How Gender Cues in Educational Video Impact Participation and Retention. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2018.

Steinke J. Cultural Representations of Gender and Science. Science Communication, 2005, 27(1), 27-63.

Ferreday D. `Showing the girl’: The new burlesque. Feminist Theory, 2008, 9(1), 47-65.

Gurrieri L, Drenten J. The feminist politics of choice: lipstick as a marketplace icon. Consumption Markets & Culture, 2019, 24(3), 1-16.

Goodnow T. On Black Panthers, Blue Ribbons, & Peace Signs: The Function of Symbols in Social Campaigns. Visual Communication Quarterly, 2006, 13(3), 166-179.

Dellinger K. Wearing gender and sexuality ‘On your sleeve’: Dress norms and the importance of occupational and organizational culture at work. Gender Issues, 2002, 20(1), 3-25

Butler J. Gender Trouble. Routledge, 2011.

Cheryan S, Plaut V C, Davie P G, Steele C M. Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2009, 97(6), 1045-1060.

Romani L, Holck L, Risberg A. Benevolent discrimination: Explaining how human resources professionals can be blind to the harm of diversity initiatives. Organization, 2018, 26(3), 371-390.

Downloads

Published

01-04-2024

How to Cite

Cao, C. (2024). Balancing Effective Visual Communication and Anti-Stereotype in Women’s Empowerment Visuals. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 28, 585-589. https://doi.org/10.54097/80fptw50