The Influence and Application of ChatGPT in the Teaching Reflection of International Chinese Teachers

Huiyu Zhu

doi:10.54097/v4p88t10

Authors

Huiyu Zhu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/v4p88t10

Keywords:

International Chinese teachers, teaching reflection, ChatGPT.

Abstract

The appearance and use of Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) has a great impact on the field of international Chinese education. The research on the combination of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language has attracted extensive attention from scholars, but there are relatively few studies on the combination of AI and teaching reflection of international Chinese teachers. This paper is to analyze the influence and application of ChatGPT in the teaching reflection of international Chinese teachers. It is concluded that ChatGPT plays a certain role in the reflection which is about teachers, students, and teaching media and environment. Based on this conclusion, the paper proposes the following suggestions: Through ChatGPT, these teachers could ensure that their attention continues to focus on information related to students' knowledge growth, and they can also provide individualized language practice and learning resources for students according to their language background. But at the same time, teachers need to pay attention to the maintenance of professional level and the improvement of human-AI interactive negotiation competence (HAINC).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jin X. Necessary Functions, Practical difficulties, and application strategies for the deep integration of ChatGPT with international Chinese education. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, 2023, 04, 52 - 58.

Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia O, Kuhn C, Brückner S, et al. Evaluating a technology-based assessment (TBA) to measure teachers’ action-related and reflective skills. International Journal of Testing, 2019, 19 (2): 148 - 171.

Wang B M. Research on the cognitive processing mechanism of teaching reflection of teachers with different experience levels--Based on evidence from eye movements and interviews. Research on Teacher Education, 2022, 04, 77 - 85.

John D. How we think. D C Heath and Company, 1933.

Schon D A. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York. Basic Books, 1983.

Zeichner K M, Liston D. Varieties of discourse in supervisory conferences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1985, 1 (2): 155 - 174.

Van Manen M. Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 1977, 6 (3): 205 - 228.

Zeichner K, Liston D. Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review, 1987, 57 (1): 23 - 49.

Zhang Y, Xu W B. On teacher's teaching judgment. Journal of East China Normal University (Education Science Edition), 2004, (03), 44 - 49.

Eby J W, Kujawa E. Reflective planning, teaching, and evaluation. New York: Merrill, 1994.

Richards J C, Lockhart C. Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Xiong L. Reflection on tradition in Chinese language teaching. Study Monthly, 2014, (02), 92-93.

Zhang B, Dong R H. How natural language processing technology empowers the AIED: The perspective of AI scientist. Journal of East China Normal University (Education Science Edition), 2022, (09), 19 - 31.

Zeng X Y, Nguyen D A. A brief account of the current situation and development of Chinese language education in Vietnam. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Teaching and Research of Chinese as a Foreign Language Edition), 2023, (02), 37 - 47.

Li N. Logic, Limit, and transcendence of AI-enhanced media literacy education. Theory and Practice of Education, 2023, (31), 10 - 15.

Wen Q F, Liang M C. Human-AI interactive negotiation competence: ChatGPT and foreign language education. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2024, (02), 286 - 296+321.