Improve Interactivity in Online Learning: Take Nearpod as an Example

Authors

  • Xuanwen Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4622

Keywords:

Online interactive learning; Learner-learner interaction; Learner-content interaction.

Abstract

Online learning is gradually taking the place of traditional teaching and training on some occasions, and how effective interaction can be ensured in an online learning environment through pedagogical design without face-to-face communication has become a topic that is expected to be studied. The importance of interactivity in learning is admitted but there is not adequate emphasis academically and pedagogically. Therefore, this research is based on the discussion of the definition, the technological tools, and the effects of online interactive learning to propose suggestions for optimizing the implementation of this learning mode. Learners' interaction with peers and learning materials are two forms of interaction that are studied in this article. These two kinds of interaction can contribute to effective peer communication, the development of critical thinking, and the support for individualized learning. To improve effectiveness, many factors of collaborative learning, multiple forms of pedagogical feedback, and the encouragement of learners’ manipulation of information should be considered in learner-learner interaction. Concerning learner-content interaction, the instructor should carefully arrange learning materials and design materials for individualized learning. Therefore, an interactive online lesson is designed by using functions in Nearpod, which is a convergence of interactive tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Huang C. Designing high-quality interactive multimedia learning modules. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 2005, 29(2-3), 223-233.

Bowen W. G. Chingos M. M. Lack K. A. Nygren T. I. Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from a six-campus randomized trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2014, 33(1), 94-111.

Lack K. A. Current status of research on online learning in postsecondary education. 2013, Ithaka S+ R, 3.

Chou C. Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems: A technical framework for designers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2003, 34(3), 265– 279.

Damnik G. Proske, A. Körndle, H. Designing a constructive learning activity with interactive elements: the effects of perspective-shifting and the quality of source material. Interactive Learning Environments, 2017, 25(5), 634-649.

Sessoms D. Interactive instruction: Creating interactive learning environments through tomorrow’s teachers. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 2008, 4(2), 86-96.

Caffarella R. S. Merriam S. B. Perspectives on adult learning: Framing our research. In 40th Annual Adult Education Research Conference Proceedings. DeKalb, 1999, IL: Northern Illinois University.

Wang Q. Woo H. L. Zhao, J. Investigating critical thinking and knowledge construction in an interactive learning environment. Interactive learning environments, 2009, 17(1), 95-104.

Vekiri I. What is the value of graphical displays in learning? Educational Psychology Review, 2002, 14(3), 261-312

Watkins B. R. Developing interactive e‐learning activities. Performance Improvement, 2005, 44(5), 5-7.

Onyema E. M. Deborah E. C. Alsayed A. O. Noorulhasan, Q. Sanober, S. Online discussion forum as a tool for interactive learning and communication. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 2019, 8(4), 4852-4859.

Balaji M. S. Chakrabarti D. Student interactions in online discussion forum: Empirical research from ‘media richness theory’ perspective. Journal of interactive online learning, 2010, 9(1).

Kennedy M. Fisher M. B. Ennis R. H. Critical thinking: Literature review and needed research. Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform, 1991, 2, 11-40.

Lai E. R. Critical thinking: A literature review. Pearson's Research Reports, 2011, 6(1), 40-41.

Wang Q. Woo H. L. Zhao J. Investigating critical thinking and knowledge construction in an interactive learning environment. Interactive learning environments, 2009, 17(1), 95-104.

Yukawa J. Co-reflection in online learning: Collaborative critical thinking as narrative. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2006, 1(2), 203-228.

Tavangarian D. Is e-Learning the Solution for Individual Learning? Electronic Journal of E-learning, 2004, 2(2), 265-272.

Kerr P. Adaptive learning. Elt Journal, 2016, 70(1), 88-93.

Spring J. Education networks: Power, wealth, cyberspace, and the digital mind. 2012, Routledge.

Hung D. Tan S.C. Chen D.T. How the Internet facilitates learning as dialog design considerations for online discussions. International Journal of Instructional Media, 2005, 32(1), 37–46.

Damnik G. Proske, A. Körndle H. Designing a constructive learning activity with interactive elements: the effects of perspective-shifting and the quality of source material. Interactive Learning Environments, 2017, 25(5), 634-649.

Fiorella L. Mayer R. E. Role of expectations and explanations in learning by teaching. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2014, 39(2), 75–85.

Witkin H. A. Moore C. A. Goodenough D. R. Cox P. W. Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 1977, 47,1-64.

Downloads

Published

07-02-2023

How to Cite

Liu, X. (2023). Improve Interactivity in Online Learning: Take Nearpod as an Example. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 1954-1960. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4622