Differential Interaction: Development of Cross-border Data Flow Governance Mechanisms In Asean
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/46q0zm63Keywords:
Differential interconstruction; ASEAN; Cross-border data flow; Governance mechanismsAbstract
Cross-border data flows, which are fueled by the digital economy, increase the productivity and efficiency of the global economy. The cross-border movement of data has a direct influence on both national security and the growth of the digital economy.Therefore, in order to deal with the security and development issues brought on by the digital geopolitical game, on the one hand, ASEAN focuses on the overall growth of the digital economy and data security,on the other hand, it continues to encourage the spread of the innovative "ASEAN+" governance model and actively participates in the creation of regulations for the digital world. The digital geostrategic competition between large nations is skillfully employed, on the other hand, to aim for a more advantageous position in order to mitigate the negative impacts brought on by mechanism fragmentation. A governance mechanism for cross-border data flow is built using the relational governance concept of “self” and “other” interaction.The negotiating cost and compliance cost will be decreased through the adaptable interplay between mechanism spillover and mechanism internalization, expanding the digital economy in the ASEAN region and enhancing competitive advantages on a worldwide scale.
Downloads
References
Digital Economy Report 2019. Digital Economy Report. 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/c7dc937a-en. DOI: 10.18356/c7dc937a-en. https://www.statista.com/study/83121/digital-economy-compass/.
Vivian Balakrishnan. The Fullerton Lecture: ASEAN—2018 and Beyond. May 14, 2018.
Lu Chuanying. The Strategic Situation and Impact of Global Digital Geopolitics. Contemporary World .2023(5):37-43.
Hong Yongmiao, Zhang Ming and Liu Ying. Promoting the safe and orderly flow of cross-border data to lead the globalization of digital economy. Journal of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Issue 10, 2022(10):1418-1825.
Amitav Acharya. “Doomed by Dialogue: Will ASEAN Survive Great Power Rivalry in Asia?”in Gilbert Rozman and Joseph ChinyongLiow eds.,International Relations and Asia’s Southern Tier ASEAN, Australia, and India, Asan-Palgrave Macmillan,2017:78.
See Richard D. Taylor. The internet in the balance, 44:8 Telecommunications Policy 102003 (2020).
Fei Xiaotong. Rural China. Shanghai People’s publishing House, 2019:36-43.
Chih-Yu Shih,et al, China and International Theory: The Balance of relationships, New York: routledge,2019:25.
Qin Yaqing. Relationship and Process: Cultural Construction of China’s International Relations Theory, Shanghai People’s publishing House, 2012:40-41.
Zhai Xuewei. The Principles of Chinese Relations: Space-time Order, Life Desire and Its Evolution, Peking University Press, 2011:236-237.
Qin Yaqing. The Relationship Theory of World Politic. Shanghai People’s Publishing House 2021 edition.
Zeng Xiang Hong, Zhang Junhou. Enemy and friend are inseparable, research on the differential interaction mode between Russia and Turkey, world economy and politics, 2023(6):23-53+168-169.
Xu Yiwen,Han Lu. Governance Dilemma of Cross-border Data Flow and Optimization of China-ASEAN Digital Economy Cooperation Strategy, Southeast Asia Vertical and Horizontal ,2022(6):90-100.
Liu Xiaofeng, Liu Yangyue. Mechanism Construction of ASEAN Cross-border Data Flow Governance, International Outlook, 2022(2):123-147+154.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






