Enterprises Patents and Marketing Capabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/adh5b237Keywords:
Innovation; technology; company operationAbstract
The literature generally agrees with the close relationship between the level of economic and technological development, but there are different views on how to define and measure the level of technological development. The traditional theory holds that the relationship between capital and labor force is the dominant factor determining the level of technological development, while the technology gap theorists link innovation activities with the level of technological development. A high level of innovation activities means a higher per capita value-added level. The standards of measuring technology level and or innovation activities can be divided into technology input measures and technology output measures. This paper aims to explore the relationship between the number of patents owned by enterprises and marketing ability, including the relationship between the number of patents and enterprise income, the advantages and disadvantages of measuring patents for enterprise development, the advantages of multiple patents for enterprises, and the classification of patent dependent enterprises and non patent dependent enterprises.
Downloads
References
Fagerberg J. A technology gap approach to why rates different. Research Policy, 1993, 22 (2): 103.
Cavenaile L, Roldan Blanco P, Schmitz T. International trade and innovation dynamics with endogenous markups The Economic Journal (London), 2023, 133 (651): 971-1004.
Guellec D, Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B. The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data. Research Policy, 2001, 30 (8): 1253-1266.
Zhao K. Competition of international trade, technology spillover, and r&d innovation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2021, 12 (2): 676-694.
Achilladelis B, Schwarzkopf A, Cines M. A study of innovation in the pesticide industry: analysis of the innovation record of an industrial sector. Research Policy, 1987, 16 (2): 175-212.
Laurens P, et al. How does internationalization affect the productivity of r&d activities in large innovative firms? A conditional nonparametric investment. Quality & Quantity, 2023, 57 (2): 1079- 1100.
Yao L, Li J, Li J. Urban innovation and international patent collaboration: a network analysis of China's national innovation system. Technical forecasting & social change, 2020, 160:120185.
Jin P, Mangla S K, Song M. The power of innovation diffusion: how patent transfer effects urban innovation quality. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 145: 414 -425.
Correa J A, Ornaghi C. Competition&innovation: evidence from U.S. patient and productivity data The Journal of Industrial Economics, 2014, 62 (2): 258-285.
Basberg B L. Foreign patching in the U.S. as a technology indicator: the case of Norway. Research Policy, 1983, 12 (4): 227 -237.
Krugman P. A model of innovation, technology transfer, and the world distribution of income," the Journal of political economy, 1979, 87 (2): 253- 266.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.