Strategic Decision-Making in Large Holding Firms: Diversification, Influencing Factors, Similarity and Difference, and Challenges

Authors

  • Kun Jiang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ves9ym64

Keywords:

Strategic decision-making; large holding firms; corporate strategy; conglomerates; diversification strategy

Abstract

Holding corporations offer a distinctive environment for strategic decision-making because of their intricate organizational structures and varied portfolios of subsidiary enterprises. This study explores the subtleties of strategic decision-making within huge holding companies, looking at both the shared and unique strategies used by these corporate behemoths. It does so by using a thorough analysis of case studies, industry reports, and interviews with important players. The study reveals several common factors, such as a dedication to long-term value creation, portfolio optimization, and risk management, in the strategic decision-making of large holding organizations. Additionally, it emphasizes how crucial leadership, governance frameworks, and the harmony between centralized and decentralized decision-making are to achieving strategic goals. This study article gives useful insights for both academic researchers and practitioners on the subject of corporate strategy by offering a thorough investigation of the strategic decision-making processes of big-holding organizations. The results lay the groundwork for future research in the areas of corporate governance, management, and performance improvement. They also provide a greater knowledge of the varied nature of decision-making within complex corporate ecosystems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rumelt R.P. Strategy, structure, and economic performance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1974.

Rumelt R.P. (1984) Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 1984, 26, 556-570.

Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 1991, 17, 99-120.

Westphal James D, and Edward J.Z. Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40(1): 60–83.

Goll I. and Rasheed A.A. The moderating effect of environmental munificence and dynamism on the relationship between discretionary social responsibility and firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 2004, 49, 41-54.

Ghemawat P. Commitment: the dynamic of strategy. Free Press, New York, 1991.

Williamson O.E. Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press, New York, 1975.

Grant R.M. Contemporary strategy analysis: text and cases edition. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2016.

Goold M and Campbell A. Desperately seeking synergy. Harvard Business Review, 1998, 76, 131-143.

Hambrick D. C, & Mason P.A. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9, 193-206.

Denison D.R, and Mishra A.K. Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 1995, 6, 204-223.

Goll I, and Rasheed A.A. The moderating effect of environmental munificence and dynamism on the relationship between discretionary social responsibility and firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 2004, 49, 41-54.

Porter M. Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance; and competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press, New York, 1980.

Werden G. J., & Simon, M. J. (1987). Why price fixers should go to prison. The Antitrust Bulletin, 32(4), 917-937.

Downloads

Published

22-01-2024

How to Cite

Jiang, K. (2024). Strategic Decision-Making in Large Holding Firms: Diversification, Influencing Factors, Similarity and Difference, and Challenges. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 24, 1774-1785. https://doi.org/10.54097/ves9ym64