Analyzing the Risk-Return Trade-Off Relationship of Chinese New Energy Firms Using the Capital Asset Pricing Model

Authors

  • Dongqi Lyu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fwj7mr52

Keywords:

Chinese New Energy Companies; Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM); Systematic Risk Analysis; Sustainable Energy Investment.

Abstract

This study examines the risk-return trade-off for prominent Chinese new energy companies within the context of the country's burgeoning sustainable energy sector. Utilizing the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), the paper investigates the systematic risk factors impacting the stock returns of BYD, CATL, and Sungrow, which are leaders in the electric vehicles, energy storage, and photovoltaic sectors, respectively. The research highlights the unique beta coefficients indicative of each company's market volatility and explores the implications of these risk profiles for investors and policymakers. While the findings suggest the presence of abnormal returns and provide valuable insights for investment strategies and policy formulation, the paper acknowledges limitations in market-based risk assessment and suggests future research to incorporate a broader range of company-specific factors and comparative analyses. This study contributes significantly to understanding the complexities and dynamics of risk management in China's rapidly advancing new energy market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

People’s Daily. (2023, June 23). Support policies for the high-quality development of the new energy vehicle industry. Retrieved from https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202306/content_6887954.htm

Shahzad, U. (2012). The need for renewable energy sources. Energy, 2(1), 16-18.

Curtin, J., McInerney, C., Gallachóir, B. Ó., Hickey, C., Deane, P., & Deeney, P. (2019). Quantifying stranding risk for fossil fuel assets and implications for renewable energy investment: A review of the literature. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 116, 109402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109402

Su, W., Zhang, D., Zhang, C., & Streimikiene, D. (2020). Sustainability assessment of energy sector development in China and European Union. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1063-1076.Lai, H., & Warner, M. (2015). Transformation of China's energy sector: trends and challenges. Asia Pacific Business Review, 21(1), 147-153.

Shen, Y., Liu, C., Sun, X., & Guo, K. (2023). Investor sentiment and the Chinese new energy stock market: A risk–return perspective. International Review of Economics & Finance, 84, 395-408.

Lai, H., & Warner, M. (2015). Transformation of China's energy sector: trends and challenges. Asia Pacific Business Review, 21(1), 147-153.

Zhang, T., & Xu, Z. (2023). The informational feedback effect of stock prices on corporate investments: A comparison of new energy firms and traditional energy firms in China. Energy Economics, 127, 107086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107086

Li, G., et al. (2023). Exploring the interconnectedness of China’s new energy and stock markets: A study on volatility spillovers and dynamic correlations. International Review of Economics & Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.10.030

Downloads

Published

10-04-2024

How to Cite

Lyu, D. (2024). Analyzing the Risk-Return Trade-Off Relationship of Chinese New Energy Firms Using the Capital Asset Pricing Model. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 30, 429-435. https://doi.org/10.54097/fwj7mr52