A Study of Underwriting Decision Making Based on ARIMA Modeling with Composite Poisson Processes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/j09wak86Keywords:
ARIMA, Bankruptcy Theory, Composite Poisson Process, Underwriting Decisions.Abstract
Facing the problem of frequent occurrence of natural disasters, how to accurately predict the scale of loss and the probability of insolvency is the key for insurance companies to reduce risk and optimize underwriting strategies. This paper explores the multiple influencing factors of catastrophe risk and works to establish a practical risk prediction model. The model is divided into two parts: the first part uses ARIMA model to predict the risk loss, considering the influence of disaster factors, vulnerability, exposure, and disaster prevention ability on the risk size; the second part establishes a positive risk model based on the bankruptcy theory, and assumes that the insurance enrollment process is a composite Poisson process, and constructs a model of the claims process. The probability of insolvency for each year is estimated by substituting the predicted loss values into the claims model and calculating the initial and annual premiums. The study conducted a five-year risk prediction for the Philippines and Australia, and the results show that there is a significant difference in disaster risk management between the two countries, which provides a theoretical basis and practical guidance for subsequent underwriting recommendations.
Downloads
References
[1] Sun T. Analysis of catastrophe insurance fund size based on bankruptcy theory [D]. Southwest University of Finance and Economics, 2022. DOI: 10.27412/d.cnki.gxncu.2022.000262.
[2] Zhang Xue, Feng Yu, Yao Jiao Ting. Comparison of fiscal and tax policies of agricultural catastrophe insurance in typical countries and inspiration[J]. Fujian Finance,2024, (03):35-42.
[3] You Yuxuan. Research on risk zoning and pricing of earthquake catastrophe reinsurance [D]. Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, 2023.DOI:10.27455/d.cnki.gycmc.2023.000740.
[4] Liang Na. Financial management risk analysis and response strategy of insurance companies[J]. Accounting Learning,2023,(19):11-13.
[5] CHAO Wen, Qian Xiaotao. Catastrophe insurance solvency analysis under the perspective of bankruptcy probability - based on mixed distribution model[J]. Journal of Insurance Vocational College,2023,37(05):51-57.
[6] Liu Zeqi. Interest rates, underwriting capacity constraints and the underwriting cycle of property insurance in China[D]. Beijing Second Institute of Foreign Languages,2018.
[7] Wei Longfei. Research on China's earthquake catastrophe risk sharing mechanism and pricing of related risk transfer instruments [D]. Northeast University of Finance and Economics, 2022.DOI:10.27006/d.cnki.gdbcu.2022.001210.
[8] Yu Shu. An empirical study of underwriting cycle in China's general insurance market based on wavelet analysis [D]. Ocean University of China, 2014.
[9] Kexin Li. Extended B-S pricing model in catastrophe risk management [D]. Shandong University of Finance and Economics, 2023.DOI:10.27274/d.cnki.gsdjc.2023.000222.
[10] Wang X. Y. Research on multi-level catastrophe insurance equilibrium model in China [D]. Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 2023.DOI:10.27296/d.cnki.gshcu.2023.000428.
Downloads
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.