Anomalies and Multi-Factor Models in the Chinese Market

Authors

  • Yiheng Feng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/3dp01877

Keywords:

Anomalies, Multi-factor model, Investment strategy portfolio.

Abstract

A stock market anomaly refers to the occurrence of excess returns in stocks that cannot be fully explained by traditional asset pricing models or the efficient market hypothesis. Studying these anomalies allows scholars to gain deeper insights into the stock market and provides investors with opportunities to capitalize on these irregularities for higher returns. In this paper, the size and value factors in the Chinese stock market are empirically tested for the period from January 2002 to December 2021, leading to several conclusions. First, the CH-3 model is found to be more suitable for the Chinese market compared to the FF-3 model. Additionally, the interpretation of anomalies using CH-3 differs from prior research, particularly regarding the CH-4 model, which incorporates a share turnover factor. These differences may stem from potential data mining effects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Barillas, F., Shanken, J. Comparing asset pricing models. Journal of Finance, 2018, 73 (2): 715-754.

[2] Carhart, M. M. On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 1997, 52 (1): 57-82.

[3] Fama, E. F., French, K. R. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 1993, 33 (1): 3-56.

[4] Fama, E. F., French, K. R. A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 2015, 116 (1): 1-22.

[5] Fama, E. F., MacBeth, J. D. Risk, return, and equilibrium: empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 1973, 81 (3): 607-636.

[6] Green, J., Hand, J. R. M., Zhang, X. F. The characteristics that provide independent information about average U.S. monthly stock returns. Review of Financial Studies, 2017, 30 (12): 4389-4436.

[7] Gibbons, M. R., Ross, S. A., Shanken, J. A test of the efficiency of a given portfolio. Econometrica, 1989, 57 (5): 1121-1152.

[8] Harvey, C. R., Liu, Y., Zhu, H. And the cross-section of expected returns. Review of Financial Studies, 2016, 29 (1): 5-68.

[9] Hou, K., Xue, C., Zhang, L. Digesting anomalies: an investment approach. Review of Financial Studies, 2015, 28 (3): 650-705.

[10] Huberman, G., Kandel, S. Mean-variance spanning. Journal of Finance, 1987, 42 (4): 873-888.

[11] Lee, C. M. C., Sun, S. T., Wang, R., Zhang, R. Technological links and return predictability. Journal of Financial Economics, 2018, forthcoming.

[12] Linnainmaa, J. T., Roberts, M. R. The history of the cross-section of stock returns. Review of Financial Studies, 2018, 31 (7): 2606-2649.

[13] Liu, J., Stambaugh, R. F., Yuan, Y. Size and value in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 2018, forthcoming.

[14] Novy-Marx, R. The other side of value: the gross profitability premium. Journal of Financial Economics, 2013, 108 (1): 1-28.

[15] Pastor, L., Stambaugh, R. F. Comparing asset pricing models: an investment perspective. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 56 (3): 335-381.

[16] Stambaugh, R. F., Yuan, Y. Mispricing factors. Review of Financial Studies, 2016, 30 (4): 1270-1315.

[17] Cheung, C., Hoguet, G., Ng, S. Value, size, momentum, dividend yield, and volatility in China’s A-share market. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 2014, 41: 57-70.

[18] Cakici, N., Chan, K., Topyan, K. Cross-sectional stock return predictability in China. European Journal of Finance, 2015, 23: 581-605.

[19] Daniel, K. D., Hirshleifer, D. A., Sun, L. Short and long-horizon behavioral factors. Review of Financial Studies, 2020, 33 (4): 1673-1736.

[20] Hou, K. H., Mo, C., Xue, C., Zhang, L. An augmented q-factor model with expected growth. Review of Finance, 2020, forthcoming.

[21] Ball, R., Gerakos, J., Linnainmaa, J. T., Nikolaev, V. Earnings, retained earnings, and book-to-market in the cross section of expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 2020, 135: 231-254.

[22] Chen, X., Kim, K. A., Yao, T., Yu, T. On the predictability of Chinese stock returns. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2010, 18: 403-425.

Downloads

Published

25-11-2024

How to Cite

Feng, Y. (2024). Anomalies and Multi-Factor Models in the Chinese Market. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 44, 159-168. https://doi.org/10.54097/3dp01877