Spillover effects between economic indicators

Authors

  • Wen Xu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/crsx6d43

Keywords:

Economic indicators; Risk contagion; TVP-VAR-DY; Chinese stock.

Abstract

Economic indicators play an important role in measuring economic development and market risk. This article selects OVX, EPU, GPR, VIX, and EMV indicators as the basic data, and uses the TVP-VAR-DY model to analyze their risk contagion effects and explore the relationship between risk spillover values and the Chinese stock market. The following conclusion has been drawn: the VIX indicator is the largest risk output in the system, and investors' panic has a profound impact on other markets; During the financial crisis, the spillover effect was different from that of the stock market, which was the main risk taker during the pandemic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Luo X, Qin S. Oil price uncertainty and Chinese stock returns: New evidence from the oil volatility index[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2017, 20: 29-34.

[2] Dutta A. Oil price uncertainty and clean energy stock returns: New evidence from crude oil volatility index[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 164: 1157-1166.

[3] Xiao, Jihong, et al. "Asymmetric impacts of oil price uncertainty on Chinese stock returns under different market conditions: Evidence from oil volatility index." Energy Economics 74 (2018): 777-786.

[4] Chen H, Liu L, Li X. The predictive content of CBOE crude oil volatility index[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2018, 492: 837-850.

[5] Liu, Tengdong, et al. "Herding in Chinese stock markets: Evidence from the dual-investor-group." Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 79 (2023): 101992.

[6] Qin, Peng, and Manying Bai. "WTI, Brent or implied volatility index: Perspective of volatility spillover from oil market to Chinese stock market." Plos one 19.4 (2024): e0302131.

[7] Baker S R, Bloom N, Davis S J. Measuring economic policy uncertainty[J]. The quarterly journal of economics, 2016, 131(4): 1593-1636.

[8] Yang, Tianle, et al. "Fluctuation in the global oil market, stock market volatility, and economic policy uncertainty: a study of the US and China." The quarterly review of economics and finance 87 (2023): 377-387.

[9] Cunado J, Gupta R, Lau C K M, et al. Time-varying impact of geopolitical risks on oil prices[J]. Defence and Peace Economics, 2020, 31(6): 692-706.

[10] Demirer R, Gupta R, Ji Q, et al. Geopolitical risks and the predictability of regional oil returns and volatility[J]. OPEC Energy Review, 2019, 43(3): 342-361.

[11] Caldara D, Iacoviello M. Measuring geopolitical risk[J]. American Economic Review, 2022, 112(4): 1194-1225.

[12] Gozgor G, Lau C K M, Sheng X, et al. The role of uncertainty measures on the returns of gold[J]. Economics Letters, 2019, 185: 108680.

[13] Baker S R, Bloom N, Davis S J, et al. Policy news and stock market volatility[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2019.

[14] Diebold F X, Yılmaz K. On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms[J]. Journal of econometrics, 2014, 182(1): 119-134.

[15] Ji, Qiang, et al. "Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets." International Review of Financial Analysis 63 (2019): 257-272.

Downloads

Published

25-11-2024

How to Cite

Xu, W. (2024). Spillover effects between economic indicators. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 44, 235-243. https://doi.org/10.54097/crsx6d43