The Impact of Multiple Institutions on Supply Chain Resilience: A Configurational Analysis Based on FsQCA

Yuan Geng

doi:10.54097/ptp20529

Authors

Yuan Geng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ptp20529

Keywords:

Supply Chain Resilience, Formal Institution, Informal Institution, FsQCA.

Abstract

In the context of the globalization of the digital economy, supply and demand are increasing, exerting considerable strain on supply chains and necessitating enhanced supply chain resilience. Nevertheless, most current research emphasizes individual institutions' influence on supply chain resilience, neglecting the interplay among various institutional elements. This research utilizes pertinent indicators from Chinese provinces between 2014 and 2024, employing a two-dimensional framework that includes formal and informal institutions. It applies fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (FsQCA) to examine the configurational conditions necessary for high supply chain resilience from a configurational viewpoint. The findings indicate: (1) four configurations contribute to elevated supply chain resilience: facility-led, facility-institution dual-drive, and facility-society-alliance-public joint-drive; (2) Investment in facilities is an essential prerequisite for achieving high supply chain resilience. The findings identify the institutional factors contributing to elevated supply network resilience, with the objective of offering recommendations for provinces to augment supply chain efficiency and bolster their capacity to manage emergencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] XIANKUI Z. Enhance the resilience and safety of the industrial chain supply in high-quality development [J]. Social sciences in Ningxia, 2023, (2): 101-107.

[2] COHEN M, CUI S L, DOETSCH S, et al. Bespoke supply-chain resilience: The gap between theory and practice [J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2022, 68(5): 515-531.

[3] YU CHUNJIAO H X, ZHAO JIAQI. The impact of deepening regional trade agreements on the resilience of global supply chains [J]. Asia-Pacific economy, 2024, (4): 49-61.

[4] ZHENNAN A A D Z. Rural digitalisation and food supply chain resilience: theoretical mechanisms, empirical evidence and policy options [J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 24(4): 83-90.

[5] MANCHERI N A, SPRECHER B, DEETMAN S, et al. Resilience in the tantalum supply chain [J]. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2018, 129: 56-69.

[6] KWON P C, YEONGBOK S E O. The Relationship between the Preceding Factors of Supply Chain Resilience, Supply Chain Resilience, and Business Performance [J]. 2021, 43(2): 1-30.

[7] JUN Y, DAN L. Public health emergencies Urban living Security Supply chain resilience system construction [J]. Safety and Environment Journal, 2024, 24(09): 3596-3605.

[8] GUCHENG Z S, LIU ZHAONING. The impact and mechanism of intelligent logistics on enterprise performance: a perspective based on supply chain resilience [J]. circulation economy, 2024, 38(07): 87-100.

[9] ALI I, NAGALINGAM S, GURD B. Building resilience in SMEs of perishable product supply chains: enablers, barriers and risks [J]. Production Planning & Control, 2017, 28(15): 1236-1250.

[10] YANG J, LIU Y, KHOLAIF M M N H K. The impact of relationship management on manufacturer resilience in emergencies [J]. Kybernetes, 2024, 53(3): 960-989.

[11] WANG YUHAO M Y, CHENG PENGFEI. Cross-border e-commerce empowers enterprises to improve supply chain resilience: Micro evidence from Chinese listed companies [J]. World Economic Research, 2024, (06): 105-119+137.

[12] HSIEH C-C, CHEN S-L, HUANG C-C. Investigating the Role of Supply Chain Environmental Risk in Shaping the Nexus of Supply Chain Agility, Resilience, and Performance [J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(20): 2071-1050.