The Impact of Trade Wars and Protectionism on the Global Economy: A Sino-US Perspective

Authors

  • Jiahao Xu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/8e69jk79

Keywords:

Sino-US trade war; protectionism; global economy; tariffs; supply chain disruption.

Abstract

The Sino-US trade war, sparked by deep-rooted economic tensions, emerged from the United States' concerns over its significant trade deficit with China and accusations of unfair practices, including intellectual property theft and forced technology transfers. Under the Trump administration, protectionist policies intensified, leading to a series of tariffs and countermeasures, impacting key industries such as agriculture, electronics, and automobiles. Although negotiations led to partial agreements, including the Phase One deal in 2020, many issues remained unresolved, and the Biden administration has maintained certain tariffs, keeping trade tensions simmering. This report delves into the far-reaching impacts of the Sino-U.S. trade conflict and the rise of protectionism on the global economy. Protectionist measures like tariffs, quotas, and subsidies disrupt international trade, raise production costs, and contribute to inflationary pressures. This not only weakens global supply chains but also reduces consumer choice, raises unemployment, and stifles economic growth, particularly in developing nations heavily reliant on exports. The trade war has also hindered investment flows and technological cooperation, especially in emerging sectors like semiconductors and artificial intelligence. In conclusion, the report advocates for strategies such as strengthening regional cooperation, diversifying supply chains, and fostering technological innovation to counter the negative effects of protectionism and promote long-term global economic resilience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Samuelson P A. Where R, Mill R. Confirm arguments of mainstream economists supporting globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2004, 18(3): 135-146.

[2] Cui J N, Zhang R. Research on the causes and countermeasures of Sino-U.S. Trade friction. Economic Research Guide, 2020, (08): 112-113.

[3] Liu J W. The demands and impacts of the U.S. trade war—focusing on the influence on the RMB to USD exchange rate. Statistics and Management, 2020, 35(08): 21-26.

[4] Bimantara A. Donald trump’s protectionist trade policy from the perspective of economic nationalism. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 2019, 7(2): 189-204.

[5] Lin C H. Impact of tariff rates on the probability of trade relationship survival: evidence from ASEAN+6 manufactured goods. Pacific Economic Review, 2020, 25(4): 457-474.

[6] Amiti M, Redding S J, Weinstein D E. The impact of the 2018 tariffs on prices and welfare. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2019, 33(4): 187-210.

[7] Barattieri A, Cacciatore M, Ghironi F. Protectionism and the Business Cycle. Journal of International Economics, 2021, 129, 103417.

[8] Makengo, B. M. Globalization and power strategies: a look at the us-china trade war. International Journal of Management Sciences and Business Research, 2020, 9, 117-143.

[9] Zhang K H. Industrial policy and technology innovation under the US trade war against China. The Chinese Economy, 2020, 53(5): 363-373.

[10] Kalsie A, Arora A. US–China trade war: The tale of clash between biggest developed and developing economies of the world. Manag Econ Res J, 2019, 5.

[11] Chi E, Cavnar T. Manufacturing firms leaving China and moving into Southeast Asia. Journal of Student Research, 2021, 10(4).

[12] Miao Y, Fei X, Sun J, Yang H. The impact of the US-China trade war on Chinese firms' investment. International Economic Journal, 2023, 37(3): 485-510.

[13] Krishnan D, Dagar V. Exchange rate and stock markets during trade conflicts in the USA, China, and India. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 2022, 14(2): 185-203.

Downloads

Published

24-12-2024

How to Cite

Xu, J. (2024). The Impact of Trade Wars and Protectionism on the Global Economy: A Sino-US Perspective. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 46, 203-208. https://doi.org/10.54097/8e69jk79