Stock Market Efficiency and International Market Integration -- Empirical Analysis with the Chinese CSI 1000 Index

Authors

  • Panfei Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/zdyhbr19

Keywords:

Efficient market hypothesis, Stock market integration; Information spillover.

Abstract

Based on daily stock returns from 2016 to 2023, the study digs into the return pattern of the Chinese A share stock index. The study first adopts the ARMA framework for the analysis of serial correlation of daily stock return. The univariate analysis shows the positive autocorrelation of stock return, which indicates the momentum feature of the stock market in the short run and rejects the efficient market hypothesis. Then the study extends the autoregression model to ARDL regression with information from American and Japanese stock markets to test for the information spillover effect. The multivariate analysis shows evidence of stock market integration, as the Chinese stock market responds to the condition of regional and global markets. Moreover, the subsample analysis shows an improvement in Chinese stock market efficiency with reduced serial correlation. Meanwhile, the responsiveness of the Chinese stock market to international markets has been lower with COVID-19 as well.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ball R. The global financial crisis and the efficient market hypothesis: what have we learned?. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. 2009, 21(4): 8-16.

Kelly BT, Moskowitz TJ, Pruitt S. Understanding momentum and reversal. Journal of financial economics. 2021, 140(3): 726-43.

Yang J, Kolari JW, Min I. Stock market integration and financial crises: the case of Asia. Applied Financial Economics. 2003, 13(7): 477-86.

Du W. News and market efficiency in the Japanese stock market. Journal of Behavioral Finance. 2021, 22(3):306-19.

Wei, S.Y., Cheng, J.H., Lin, L.W. and Gan, S.M. Volatility Asymmetry of Scale Indexes-Taking China as an Example. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2020, 10(4), 158-169.

Yilmazkuday H. COVID-19 effects on the S&P 500 index. Applied Economics Letters. 2023, 30(1): 7-13.

Gu M, Kang W, Xu B. Limits of arbitrage and idiosyncratic volatility: Evidence from China stock market. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2018, 86: 240-58.

Fuller WA. Introduction to statistical time series. John Wiley & Sons, 2009.

Granger CW, Newbold P. Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of econometrics. 1974, 2(2): 111-20.

Box GE, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC, Ljung GM. Time series analysis: forecasting and control. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.

Malkiel BG. The efficient market hypothesis and its critics. Journal of economic perspectives. 2003, 17(1): 59-82.

Cen L, Wei KJ, Yang L. Disagreement, underreaction, and stock returns. Management Science. 2017, 63(4): 1214-31.

Ikenberry DL, Ramnath S. Underreaction to self-selected news events: The case of stock splits. The Review of Financial Studies. 2002, 15(2): 489-526.

Huyghebaert N, Wang L. The co-movement of stock markets in East Asia: Did the 1997–1998 Asian financial crisis really strengthen stock market integration?. China Economic Review. 2010, 21(1): 98-112.

Downloads

Published

29-03-2024

How to Cite

Zhang, P. (2024). Stock Market Efficiency and International Market Integration -- Empirical Analysis with the Chinese CSI 1000 Index. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 88, 1290-1296. https://doi.org/10.54097/zdyhbr19