Predicting and Analysing Match Momentum in Tennis Matches Using Entropy Weight Method-based TOPSIS and XGBoost Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/5wn9xy15Keywords:
TOPSIS, Entropy Weight Method, XGBoost, Match Momentum.Abstract
Tennis players' round performance scores and the prediction and analysis of match momentum in tennis matches are important for players, coaches and the media. Accurate and appropriate predictions and analyses are important for players and coaches to adjust their tactics in time, for media to analyse and report, and for spectators to experience and interact. Firstly, in order to quantify the performance of players, a comprehensive evaluation model of TOPSIS based on entropy weight method was constructed based on the theory of TOPSIS model and the advantage of entropy weight method in reducing subjectivity in the evaluation process. Secondly, in order to accurately predict the match momentum of tennis matches, XGBoost (Extreme Gradient Boosting) model was constructed. The model not only has extremely high prediction accuracy, but also improves the generalisation ability of the model, reduces overfitting, and has the advantages of automation and robustness. Finally, the constructed machine learning model is reasonably interpreted using the shap model to provide a scientific basis for players and coaches to change tactics and adjust training methods in a timely manner.
Downloads
References
Kovalchik S A. Searching for the GOAT of tennis win prediction [J]. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 2016, 12 (3): 127-138.
Baker R D, McHale I G. An empirical Bayes model for time-varying paired comparisons ratings: Who is the greatest women’s tennis player? [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 258 (1): 328-333.
Wilkens S. Sports prediction and betting models in the machine learning age: The case of tennis [J]. Journal of Sports Analytics, 2021, 7 (2): 99-117.
Vaughan Williams L, Liu C, Dixon L, et al. How well do Elo-based ratings predict professional tennis matches? [J]. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 2021, 17 (2): 91-105.
Gao Z, Kowalczyk A. Random forest model identifies serve strength as a key predictor of tennis match outcome[J]. Journal of Sports Analytics, 2021, 7 (4): 255-262.
Angelini G, Candila V, De Angelis L. Weighted Elo rating for tennis match predictions [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2022, 297 (1): 120-132.
Candila V, Palazzo L. Neural networks and betting strategies for tennis[J]. Risks, 2020, 8 (3): 68.
Ganser A, Hollaus B, Stabinger S. Classification of tennis shots with a neural network approach [J]. Sensors, 2021, 21 (17): 5703.
Yue J C, Chou E P, Hsieh M H, et al. A study of forecasting tennis matches via the Glicko model [J]. Plos one, 2022, 17 (4): e0266838.
Tea P, Swartz T B. The analysis of serve decisions in tennis using Bayesian hierarchical models [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2023, 325 (1): 633-648.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







