Study of Green GDP Based on the Ecological Footprint Model

Authors

  • Wei Wang
  • Jiayue Song
  • Yunjie Dai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/n28h3q31

Keywords:

GGDP, SEEA-2012, Climate Change, Ecological Footprint, EKC Curves.

Abstract

To explicitly assess the impact of the implementation of GGDP policies on global climate, this paper analyzes multiple manifestations of climate change. Using analytic hierarchy process, the significance of each manifestation was assessed, with carbon dioxide being the most significant. In this paper, "carbon emissions" is used as a research index, and the relation function y=68.56 + 0.002* investment in environmental governance + 0.004* investment in environmental degradation was obtained by fitting the carbon emission variation and the sum of investment in environmental pollution control and environmental degradation with least square method.  In addition, this paper introduces the "ecological footprint model", which uses the ecological footprint demand and ecological carrying capacity to jointly calculate the ecological damage level index of a country or region, to evaluate the sustainable development level and assist the carbon emission model to objectively evaluate the impact of the implementation of GGDP policies on the global climate. The advantages and disadvantages of the implementation of GGDP policy are also analyzed, the EKC curve is introduced, and suggestions for improvement are put forward for the possible fairness problems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

SHEN Xiaoyan1, WANG Guanghong1, HUANG Xianjin sup, et al. The calculation and spatial-temporal pattern of green GDP in China from 1997 to 2013 [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(10): 12.

Wang Yan, Liu Bangfan, Guo Lihong. Construction and spatial-temporal Pattern analysis of China's green GDP accounting System Based on SEEA-2012 [J]. Ecological Economy, 2021, 37(9): 10.

Qiu Qiong, Shi Han. China ecosystem accounting improvement based on SEEA —— EA [J]. China's Land and Resources Economy, 2023,36 (11): 4-15.

Kaili Yang. Datong Green GDP Accounting based on SEEA-2012 [C] // Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences (Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences). Proceedings of the 2022 Science and Technology Annual Conference of the Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences (I). Shanxi University of Finance and Economics; 2022:6.

Sun Ying, Fan Jin, Jia Weiguo. Research on the stage and effective path of achieving carbon peak —— Based on the perspective of green GDP accounting [J]. Industrial Technology and Economy, 2023,42 (12): 95-104.

Fan Jin, Wang Hongshu. Measurement and comparison of green added value among provinces in the Yangtze River Delta region based on the "double carbon" target [J]. Journal of Guizhou Party School, 2022, (05): 78-93.

Xu Heng, Li Hongji. Re-discussion on some problems in green GDP statistics [J]. Modern Finance and Economics - Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, 2002, 22(010):3-7,53.

Li Yunfeng; Chen Zhuo; Lei Hailiang; Liu Chang; [Lu Y R. Spatio-temporal evolution and ecological sustainability of ecological footprint in Heilongjiang Province. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology

Evaluation of urban sustainable development based on ecological footprint model. Qinghai Environment, 2022, 32(03): 109-115.]

Wang Xiaoying. Analysis of carbon emission and economic growth in Henan Province —— is based on EKC model and Tapio decoupling model [J]. Market Weekly, 2024,37 (04): 58-61.

Downloads

Published

28-07-2024

How to Cite

Wang, W., Song, J., & Dai, Y. (2024). Study of Green GDP Based on the Ecological Footprint Model. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 110, 161-169. https://doi.org/10.54097/n28h3q31