Study on dynamic response distribution of excavated highway slope under dynamic action

Zhixiang Wang; Shuli Xie; Linlin Liu

doi:10.54097/ag2ge407

Authors

Zhixiang Wang
Shuli Xie
Linlin Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ag2ge407

Keywords:

Seismic Dynamic Action, Highway Slope, Response Distribution Reinforcement Measure.

Abstract

In order to study the dynamic response distribution law of highway foundation pit slope under seismic dynamics, the dynamic response distribution law of cutting slope at different grading heights was compared and studied, and the dynamic instability model under gravity instability and seismic disturbance was established by using UDEC700 software, and the simulation calculation was carried out. The difference between static instability and dynamic instability of fractured rock slope is compared and analyzed, and the post-earthquake stress is greater than that before the earthquake. Under the action of power, the velocity at the top of the slope is greater than the velocity at the bottom of the slope, the velocity outside the upper platform is greater than the velocity inside, and the velocity inside the lower platform is greater than the velocity outside. This provides a new perspective for understanding the dynamic response of highway foundation pit slope under seismic dynamics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A Ziwei. Study on the Stability Analysis and Influencing Factors of Anti-dumping Layered Rock Slope [D]. Xi'an University of Technology, 2023. DOI:10.27398/d.cnki.gxalu.2023.001317

[2] Chen Yonggang, Tang Hua, and Qin Yuqiao. Study on the Dynamic Failure Mode and Zoning of Anti-dumping Slope Based on the Discrete Element Method [J]. Journal of Henan Urban Construction Institute, 2024, 33(01):64-71+95. DOI:10.14140/j.cnki.hncjxb.2024.01.009

[3] Tang Hui, Zhong Wanbo, and Jiang Jie. The Influence of Joint Fracture Distribution and Occurrence on the Stability Analysis of High and Steep Slope [J]. Engineering Technology Research, 2021, 6(15): 46-48+140. DOI: 10.19537/j.cnki.2096-2789.2021.15.017

[4] Kuang Yi, Qiu Shibo, Chen Yixin, et al. Dynamic stability analysis of slope under earthquake action based on FLAC3D [J]. Water Resources Planning and Design, 2023, (05): 61-69

[5] Yin Xiaojun, WANG Lanmin. Study on dynamic sliding displacement of loess slope under earthquake [J]. Earthquake Engineering Journal,2022,44(05):1067-1073.DOI:10.20000/j.1000-0844.20201018001

[6] Zhang Huajin. Research on Data-Driven Analysis Method for Rock Slope Stability [D]. Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2023. DOI: 10.27200/d.cnki.gkmlu.2023.000051

[7] Munjiza A, Smoljanović H, Živaljić N, et al. Structural applications of the combined finite–discrete element method[J]. Computational particle mechanics, 2020, 7: 1029-1046.

[8] Basahel H, Mitri H. Application of rock mass classification systems to rock slope stability assessment: a case study. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 9 (6): 993–1009[J]. 2017.

[9] Zakaria M T, Muztaza N M, Omar M R, et al. Stability analysis of geotechnical properties of slopes by seismic waves [J]. Maejo International Journal of Science & Technology, 2022, 16(2).

[10] Zhou L, Su L, Wang Z, et al. Slope Stability and Effectiveness of Treatment Measures during Earthquake [J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(6): 5309.