Research on Animal Communication Ethics of Platform Media

Authors

  • Ziyan Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/2kyjes60

Keywords:

Animal, Digital Media, Domestication

Abstract

Digital media has a comprehensive penetration of ordinary people's daily life by virtue of the presence of diverse forms and multiple realities, and reshapes human perception, realizing the impact on people's cognition. Therefore, for the ordinary audience who are "separated" and have no "animal experience", the cognition of animals comes from the construction of animals by digital media to a large extent, and this construction itself is divorced from the imagination of animals in real natural life. Based on the analysis of the current communication practice of animal short videos and live broadcasts, this paper attempts to explore the problems existing in the construction of the relationship between animals and humans by digital media, and through specific cases to demonstrate the domestication logic of human beings and animals behind animal short videos and live broadcasts, as well as the spiritual hallucination and "ambiguity of human beings and animals" caused by the spectacular drama and entertainment of animals with the help of digital media .

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wu Jing, Wang Yuanzhao. Thinking on the transformation of traditional media under the prospect of digital communication [J]. Young journalist, 2023(08):25-33.

Duan Yan. Other Redefinition: Transformation of Human-Animal Relationship [EB/OL]. China Social Science Network, https:// www. cssn.cn/skgz/ bwyc/202301/ t20230117_ 5583 248. shtml.

Roel Sterckx. The Animal and the Daemon in Early China [M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002.

Duan Yifu. Dominance and affection: The Making of Pets[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984.

Silverstone R. Television and everyday life[M]. New York: Routledge, 1994:223-230;174.

Yao Jianhua. The Political Economy of Communication and Labor Transformation in the Digital Age [J]. Global Media Journal, 2018(4):92-96.

Teranova T. Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy [J].Social Text,2000(2):33-58.

Alessandro Gandini. Labor Process Theory and the Gig Economy[J]. HumanRelations,2019(6):1039-1056.

John Berger: Why Look at Animals? [M]. London: Penguin Books Ltd, 2009.

Douglas Kellner. Media spectacle [M]. London: Routledge, 2003:6.

Kringelbach, M. L., Stark, E. A., Alexander, C., Bornstein, M. H., & Stein, A. (2016). On cuteness: Unlocking the parental brain and beyond. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(7), 545–558.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.003.

Giorgio Agamben. The Open:man and animal [M]. NewYork: Stanford University Press, 2003.

Murray, Janth.Hamlet on the Holodeck: the future of narrative in Cybwespace[M]. New York: Free Press,1997:98.

Paul VirilioLa. Vitesse de libératio[M]. Paris:ditions Galil.e, 1995.

Downloads

Published

29-07-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang , Z. (2024). Research on Animal Communication Ethics of Platform Media. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 8(1), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.54097/2kyjes60