Risks of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Multi-Tool Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/stvem930Keywords:
Generative Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Risk, Multi-tool GovernanceAbstract
While generative AI, represented by ChatGPT, brings a technological revolution and convenience to life, it may raise a series of social and legal risks, mainly including violation of personal privacy and data security issues, infringement of intellectual property rights, generation of misleading and false content, and exacerbation of discrimination and prejudice. However, the traditional AI governance paradigm oriented towards conventional AI may not be adequately adapted to generative AI with generalized potential and based on big models. In order to encourage the innovative development of generative AI technology and regulate the risks, this paper explores the construction of a generative AI governance paradigm that combines legal regulation, technological regulation, and ethical governance of science and technology, and promotes the healthy development of generative AI on the track of safety, order, fairness, and co-governance.
Downloads
References
[1] Guo Yu Jie,Ding Guo Feng.Data security risk and response of ChatGPT generative AI[J]. Big Data Times,2023, (07):24-31.
[2] Li Sen. The governance path of generative artificial intelligence data security under the risk prevention perspective - taking GPT class model as an example[J]. Journal of Tibet University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2023,44(06):139-145.
[3] Chen Mingtao. Analysis of patent infringement liability under the conditions of cloud computing technology[J]. Intellectual Property Rights, 2017(3):50-59.
[4] Wei Yuanshan. Copyright law responses to generative AI training data: is a fair use rule really needed? [J/OL]. Library and Intelligence Knowledge,2024.
[5] Wu Zongxian,Xiao Yanqiu. Application, risk and legal response of generative artificial intelligence--taking ChatGPT as a perspective[J]. Journal of Tianjin Normal University (Social Science Edition),2024,(03):12-20.
[6] Liu Dian. An overview of the legislative process and main contents of the EU Artificial Intelligence Bill.
[7] Zhang Linghan,Yu Lin. From traditional governance to agile governance: governance paradigm innovation for generative artificial intelligence[J]. E-government, 2023, (09):2-13.
[8] Zhang Linghan. Legal Positioning and Layered Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence[J]. Modern Law,2023, 45 (04):126-141.
[9] Ding Xiaodong. On the legal regulation of algorithms[J]. Chinese Social Science,2020(12):138-159+203.
[10] Anirudh VK.This could be the End of Bing Chat, https:// analyticsindiamag.com. this-could-be-the-end of-bing-chat/, accessed 28 May 2024.
[11] Roger Brownsword. Law 3.0: rules, regulation and technology [M]. Mao Haidong, Translation. Beijing: Peking University Press,2023: 42+119-125.
[12] See AWS official website, https://aws.amazon.com/cn/what-is/synthetic-data/, accessed on 4 September 2024.
[13] Xiao Hongjun,Yang Zhen. Ethical Regulation of Digital Technology: Progress in the U.S. and Lessons from China[J]. Research on Financial Issues, 2023, (06):73-86.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.