Research on the Role of New Quality Productivity in Reshaping the Theoretical Framework of Public Management in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data

Haoxuan Yin; Haichu Pan; Linbin Li; Junbo Chen; Yunting Fan

doi:10.54097/7swy8230

Authors

Haoxuan Yin
Haichu Pan
Linbin Li
Junbo Chen
Yunting Fan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/7swy8230

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, New Quality Productivity, Public Management, Collaborative Governance

Abstract

In the context of the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) and big data technology, new quality productivity is profoundly affecting the theory and practice of public management. Based on the in-depth analysis of the characteristics of new qualitative productivity driven by AI and big data, this paper discusses the process of reshaping public management theory. The study points out that the new quality productivity has endowed public management with new characteristics of data-driven, intelligent decision-making, collaborative governance and precise service, and proposes a theoretical framework of public management to adapt to this transformation. The main conclusions of this study include that AI and big data are profoundly reshaping traditional public management theories, data-driven and intelligent decision-making have become the core pillars, and collaborative governance and precise services constitute the mainstream mode of public management in the new era. In terms of theoretical contributions, this study not only constructs a new framework of public management theory that adapts to the new quality of productivity, but also enriches the relevant management theory system. In terms of practical implications, the study suggests that the government should formulate technology and data governance policies and strengthen the deep integration of technology and social systems to optimize public services and governance effects. Although this study has limitations in terms of sample coverage and time span, it provides a direction for further discussion of international comparison and technology ethics in the future. Through theoretical analysis and practical guidance, this study aims to help public management achieve high-quality development in the era of new quality productivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.

[2] Davenport, T. H., & Harris, J. G. (2007). Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning. Harvard Business Review Press.

[3] Chen, H., Chiang, R. H., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165-1188.

[4] Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the Hype: Big Data Concepts, Methods, and Analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 137-144.

[5] Kitchin, R. (2014). Big Data, New Epistemologies, and Paradigm Shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1-12.

[6] Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, Adoption Barriers, and Myths of Open Data and Open Government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258-268.

[7] Schroeck, M., Shockley, R., Smart, J., Romero-Morales, D., & Tufano, P. (2012). Analytics: The Real-World Use of Big Data. IBM Institute for Business Value.

[8] Cresswell, A. M., & Pardo, T. A. (2001). Factors Influencing the Success and Failure of Public Sector Knowledge Networks. Government Information Quarterly, 18(4), 249-268.

[9] Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A New Theory for Public Service Management? Towards a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach. American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135-158.

[10] Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the Smart City: A Review of the Literature on Smart Urban Governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392-408.

[11] Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining Digital Transformation: Results from Expert Interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385.

[12] Wang, F.-Y. (2010). The Emergence of Intelligent Enterprises: From CPS to CPSS. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 25(4), 85-88.

[13] Janssen, M., Wimmer, M. A., & Deljoo, A. (Eds.). (2015). Policy Practice and Digital Science: Integrating Complex Systems, Social Simulation and Public Administration in Policy Research. Springer.

[14] Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. Portfolio.

[15] Helbing, D. (2019). Towards Digital Enlightenment: Essays on the Dark and Light Sides of the Digital Revolution. Springer.

[16] Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467-494.

[17] Janssen, M., van der Voort, H., & Wahyudi, A. (2017). Factors Influencing Big Data Decision-Making Quality. Journal of Business Research, 70, 338-345.

[18] Bollier, D. (2010). The Promise and Peril of Big Data. Aspen Institute.

[19] George, G., Haas, M. R., & Pentland, A. (2014). Big Data and Management. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 321-326.

[20] Kankanhalli, A., Zuiderwijk, A., & Tayi, G. K. (2017). Open Innovation in the Public Sector: A Research Agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 84-89.