The Impact of the Industrial and Financial Cooperation Pilot on Urban Energy Transition: A Difference-in-Differences Approach

Authors

  • Chenyu Jiang School of International Economics and Business, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/3dfzpe15

Keywords:

Industrial and Financial Cooperation Policies, Sulfur Dioxide (SO₂) Emission Intensity, Multi-period Difference-in-Differences, Structure Effect, Resource-based Cities

Abstract

One of the important measures to support green transformation of industry and improve the real economy of financial services is to carry out a pilot program Industrial and Financial Cooperation Policies. This study employs a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) approach for evaluating the impact of a pilot policy on urban sulfur dioxide (SO₂) emission intensity, based on panel data from 112 Chinese cities over the period 2014–2022.Controlling for both city and year fixed effects, our findings reveal that the pilot policy significantly increases the SO₂ emission intensity of treated cities, indicating that the policy fails to achieve its intended emission reduction. Robustness checks, including winsorization to mitigate the influence of outliers and the exclusion of municipalities from the sample, consistently confirm that the previously estimated effect remains statistically significant. An expansion of the industrial sector is indicated by mechanism analysis, which reveals that the policy considerably increases share of the secondary sector in GDP. The main cause of the rise in emission intensity is this structural change. According to heterogeneity analysis, the policy effect is statistically minor in resource-based cities and mostly concentrated in non-resource-based cities. Additionally, because treated cities have a larger patent base, even while the strategy increases total green patent applications, the proportional growth rate is less than that of the control group. In resource-based cities, the impact of green innovation is likewise negligible. This study provides empirical evidence for improving green finance policies by showing how Industrial and Financial Cooperation Policies may produce short-term environmental rebound effects by promoting industrial expansion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Yu, H. (2015). Evolution trends and forecast of industrial structure and employment structure. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, (6), 26–31.

[2] Fu, L. H. (2010). An empirical research on industry structure and economic growth. Statistical Research, 27(8), 79–81.

[3] Wang, W. (2022). Can industrial financial cooperation promote the upgrading of the industrial structure? Evidence from national industry integration as pilot cities. Guangdong University of Finance and Economics.

[4] Lin, J. Y., & Li, Y. (2001). Promoting the growth of medium and small-sized enterprises through the development of medium and small-sized financial institutions. Economic Research Journal, (1), 10–18.

[5] Liu, Z. Y., Ha, X. Z., & Cao, J. P. (2024). Industry-finance integration and the efficiency of financial services in the real economy: A quasi-natural experiment based on pilot cities. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 44(12), 44–58, 206–207.

[6] Sun, H. (2025). Effect of industry-finance cooperation on the maturity mismatch of corporate investment and financing: A quasi-natural experiment based on pilot cities. Shandong University of Finance and Economics.

[7] He, X. Y., Liu, S. A., & Wang, H. (2025). Industrial-financial cooperation and short-term loans and long-term investment: Empirical evidence from the pilot policy for industrial-financial cooperation. Accounting and Finance, 40(3), 31–42.

[8] Zhuo, X. F., He, H. H., & Guo, Y. J. (2026). Industry-finance cooperation and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from national pilot cities for industry-finance cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Finance, 1–19.

[9] Huang, C. S. (2024). Study on the impact of industry-integrated cooperation on industrial green development. Guangdong University of Finance and Economics.

[10] Jiang, W. L. (2025). The impact of Industrial and Financial Cooperation on the green transformation of manufacturing enterprises. Qufu Normal University.

[11] Wang, Z. L., & Shang, H. B. (2024). How does industrial finance policy impact urban carbon reduction? A quasi-natural experiment from the industrial-financial cooperation policy. Industrial Economics Research, (6), 1–14.

[12] Liu, S., Luo, J. Y., & Chen, X. Y. (2022). Evaluation of the impact of Industrial and Financial Cooperation Policies on enterprise innovation: Evidence from the perspective of scale development and connotation improvement. Research on Economics and Management, 43(10), 53–67.

[13] Yang, Z. M., Li, Y. C., & Li, Y. M. (2025). Can Pilot Policies for Industry and Finance Cooperation Enhance the Level of Green Innovation in Enterprises. Contemporary Finance & Economics, (5), 72–82.

[14] Han, Y. H., & Dou, Z. (2025). Has the Industrial and Financial Cooperation policy promoted corporate green innovation? An experiment based on the pilot policy and listed company data. Academic Research, (6), 100–108.

[15] Yang, Y. W. (2024). Study on the impact of Industrial-Financial Cooperation Policies on green innovation: Analysis based on a difference-in-differences model. Shanghai International Studies University.

[16] Wang, Y., Wang, S., & Kong, D. M. (2024). Can the construction of national industrial and financial cooperation pilot cities promote corporate innovation? Journal of Finance and Economics, 50(1), 79–93.

[17] Zhao, H., & Meng, Y. (2022). Coupling coordination measurement and evaluation of urban digital economy and green technology innovation in China. China Soft Science, (9), 97–107.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2026

Issue

Section

Articles