Biomechanical Analysis and Mobility Improvement of Auxiliary Mobile Equipment

Yufan Jiang

doi:10.54097/h1mh9c33

Authors

Yufan Jiang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/h1mh9c33

Keywords:

Exoskeleton booster, Biomechanical analysis, auxiliary mobile equipment, mobility.

Abstract

As an advanced auxiliary mobile device, exoskeleton booster has attracted wide attention in the field of rehabilitation and life assistance. Through biomechanical analysis, this paper discusses the effect of exoskeleton booster on user mobility. Using biomechanical tools such as kinematics, dynamics and muscle mechanics, this paper deeply studies the influence of exoskeleton booster in different motion States, and verifies its biomechanical effect through simulation and experiment. Firstly, this paper analyzes the influence of exoskeleton booster on gait from the perspective of kinematics. The research shows that the exoskeleton booster can improve the walking efficiency of users by optimizing the step size and step frequency. The precise adjustment of joint motion by intelligent control system enables exoskeleton to better adapt to the gait characteristics of different users. Secondly, through dynamic analysis, this paper deeply studies the influence of exoskeleton on joint torque. The exoskeleton is designed to apply appropriate torque at key joints to help users complete the movement. The synergistic effect of this moment not only reduces the muscle burden of users, but also improves the stability of joints and reduces the risks in sports. In terms of improving mobility, exoskeleton technology can significantly improve the gait of patients in rehabilitation training, which is helpful to improve the balance ability of patients. The improvement effect of exoskeleton technology directly affects the quality of daily life of patients. This biomechanical effect provides strong support for the extensive application of exoskeleton technology in rehabilitation, sports assistance and daily life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Burnik, U. , Dobravec, S. , & Meza, M. (2019). Design of a secure remote management module for a software-operated medical device. Biomedizinische Technik, 64(1), 67-80.

Awaja, F. , Wong, T. T. , & Arhatari, B. (2018). Lab-on-a-chip device made by autohesion-bonded polymers. Biomedical Microdevices, 20(1), 7.

Rao, A. , Carreon, N. , Lysecky, R. , & Rozenblit, J. (2017). Probabilistic threat detection for risk management in cyber-physical medical systems. IEEE Software, 35(1), 38-43.

Jabran, A. , Peach, C. , Zou, Z. , & Ren, L. (2018). Hybrid blade and locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures: a comparative biomechanical analysis. Biomedical Engineering Online, 17(1), 10.

Guevara, J. G. , Peterlik, I. , Berger, M. O. , & Cotin, Stéphane. (2019). Elastic registration based on compliance analysis and biomechanical graph matching. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2019(229), 1-16.

Pataky, T. C. (2010). Generalized n-dimensional biomechanical field analysis using statistical parametric mapping. Journal of Biomechanics, 43(10), 1976-1982.

Angulo-Kinzler, R. M. , Kinzler, S. B. , Balius, X. , Turro, C. , Caubet, J. M. , & Escoda, J. , et al. (2010). Biomechanical analysis of the pole vault event. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 10(2), 147-165.

Wolanski, W. , Larysz, D. , Gzik, M. , & Kawlewska, E. (2014). Modeling and biomechanical analysis of craniosynostosis correction with the use of finite element method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 29(9), 916-925.

Bessone, L. M. , Enrique Fernández Bodereau, Cabanillas, G. , & Dominguez, A. (2014). Analysis of biomechanical behaviour of anterior teeth using two different methods: finite element method and experimental tests. Engineering, 6(3), 148-158.

Kaiser, M. M. , Wessel, L. M. , Zachert, G. , Stratmann, C. , Eggert, R. , & Gros, N. , et al. (2011). Biomechanical analysis of a synthetic femur spiral fracture model: influence of different materials on the stiffness in flexible intramedullary nailing. Clinical Biomechanics, 26(6), 592-597.