Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Analysis based on IV and IV-IOE Models: A Case Study of Mao County

Fulu Sun; Yanan Lv

doi:10.54097/kqyne746

Authors

Fulu Sun
Yanan Lv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/kqyne746

Keywords:

Susceptibility Assessment; Information Quantity Model; Information Quantity-Entropy Model; ROC.

Abstract

Taking Mao County as the study area, and based on existing data combined with the characteristics of landslide development in the study area, six evaluation factors including elevation, slope gradient, aspect, land use, NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index), and rainfall were selected. An independence test was conducted using Pearson correlation analysis to establish an evaluation index system for landslide disaster susceptibility. The study on the susceptibility of landslide geological disasters was carried out using both the Information Quantity Model and the Information Quantity-Entropy Index Model. The evaluation results were divided into five levels—extremely low, low, medium, high, and very high—using the natural break method based on GIS. The susceptibility of landslide geological disasters in the study area was clarified, and the accuracy was tested using the ROC curve. The experimental results show that the AUC values of the two evaluation models are 0.847 and 0.865, respectively, indicating that the Information Quantity-Entropy Index Model is superior to the Information Quantity Model and has stronger robustness in predicting the accuracy of landslide susceptibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wang X ,Bai S .Landslide Susceptibility Mapping and Interpretation in the Upper Minjiang River Basin[J].Remote Sensing, 2023,15(20).

Kumar D, Thakur M, Dubey C S et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping & prediction using Support Vector Machine for Mandakini River Basin, Garhwal Himalaya, India[J]. Geomorphology, 2017,295(Oct.15): 115-125.

Yesilnacar E, Topal T Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region(Turkey)[J]. Engineering Geology, 2005,79(3-4): 251-266.

Kalantar B, Ueda N, Al-Najjar H A H et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Dodangeh watershed, Iran, using LR and ANN models in GIS[C]. SPIE REMOTE SENSING.2018.

Jibson, R .W. and Keefer, D.K.: 1989, Statistical Analysis of Factors Affecting Landslide Distribution inthe New Madrid Seismic Zone, Tennessee and Kentucky, Engineering Geology 27, 509-542.

Youssef Ahmed Mohamed, Pourghasemi Hamid Reza. Landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning algorithms and comparison of their performance at Abha Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia[J].Geoscience Frontiers, 2021,12(2).

Gogtay, Nithya J., and Urmila M. Thatte. "Principles of correlation analysis." Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 65.3 (2017): 78-81.

SHADMAN ROODPOSHTI M, ARYAL J, SHAHABI H, et al. Fuzzy shannon entropy: A hybrid gis-based landslide susceptibility mapping method[J]. Entropy, 2016, 18(10): 343.

LIU J, WANG J, XIONG J, et al. Hybrid models incorporating bivariate statistics and machine learning methods for flash flood susceptibility assessment based on remote sensing datasets [J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(23): 4945.

SUJATHA E R, SRIDHAR V. Landslide susceptibility analysis: A logistic regression model case study in Coonoor, India [J]. Hydrology, 2021, 8(1): 41.