Comprehensive Benefit Valuation of Sponge City Development: A Case Study of Daguan Wetland Park, Guangzhou

Yaru Fu

doi:10.54097/r95q9513

Authors

Yaru Fu College of the Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/r95q9513

Keywords:

Sponge City, constructed wetlands, comprehensive benefit valuation, monetization, Daguan Wetland Park.

Abstract

Against the background of Sponge City development, the ecological performance of constructed wetlands has been widely demonstrated, yet their comprehensive benefits still lack an integrated accounting framework and empirical assessment. Taking Daguan Wetland Park in Guangzhou as a case study, this paper develops a monetary valuation framework for its comprehensive benefits. Based on real estate market transaction data from 2025, the 0–1500 m buffer zone is defined as the treatment group and the 1500–3000 m buffer zone as the control group. Sensitivity analyses are further incorporated to identify the net land value premium attributable to the wetland. At the same time, annual ecological flow benefits, including rainwater reuse, runoff control, and operation and maintenance cost savings, are quantified. These benefits are separately accounted for from the land value appreciation component, and a benefit–cost ratio (BCR) is calculated. The results show that over the 10-year operating period following the completion of Daguan Wetland Park, the project generated a total comprehensive benefit of CNY 581.8435 million, of which direct ecological benefits amounted to CNY 19.1644 million. Spatial spillover benefits amounted to CNY 562.6791 million, accounting for approximately 98% of the total benefits. Enterprises exhibited an implicit willingness-to-pay rate of 27.38% for the wetland-related ecological location premium, and the benefit–cost ratio reached 2.45. These findings confirm the significant economic viability of investing in urban sponge infrastructure. This study provides the first empirical valuation of a Sponge City wetland in a high-risk urban flooding area of the Greater Bay Area and offers strategic insights and practical references for the development and market-oriented investment of sponge infrastructure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chang W, Liu G, Chen Y, et al. Assessing inter-industrial ecosystem service flows and economic benefits of sponge city: A comprehensive input-output analysis [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2025, 114: 107955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107955

[2] General Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China. Guiding Opinions of the General Office of the State Council on Promoting Sponge City Development [Z]. State Council General Office Document No. 75 [2015], 2015.

[3] Dang Fei. Comprehensive Benefits and Monetary Valuation of Sponge City Development: A Case Study of Fengxi New City, Xixian New Area [D]. Xi'an University of Technology, 2019.

[4] Costanza R, d'Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0

[5] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2005.

[6] TEEB. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. Kumar P, ed. Abingdon & New York: Routledge; 2010.

[7] Boyer T, Polasky S. Valuing urban wetlands: a review of non-market valuation studies. Wetlands. 2004; 24(4): 744–755. doi:10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024 [0744: VUWARO] 2.0.CO;2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0744:VUWARO]2.0.CO;2

[8] Ghermandi A, van den Bergh JCJM, Brander L, de Groot HLF, Nunes PALD. Meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies: a meta-regression analysis of natural vs. constructed wetlands. Water Resources Research. 2010; 46(12): W12516. doi:10.1029/2010WR009289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009071

[9] Zhu Y, Xu C, Yin D, et al. Environmental and economic cost-benefit comparison of sponge city construction in different urban functional regions [J]. Journal of environmental management, 2022, 304: 114230.

[10] Xu C, Lin W, Zhu Y, et al. A macro-level life cycle environmental-economic impact and benefit assessment of sponge cities in China [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2024, 211: 107859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107859

[11] Liang, X. Integrated Economic and Financial Analysis of China’s Sponge City Program for Water-resilient Urban Development. Sustainability 2018, 10, 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030669

[12] Zhu Y, Xu C, Yin D, Xu J, Wu Y, Jia H. Environmental and economic cost-benefit comparison of sponge city construction in different urban functional regions. Journal of Environmental Management. 2022; 304: 114230. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114230

[13] Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition[J]. Journal of political economy, 1974, 82(1): 34-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260169

[14] Tapsuwan, S., Ingram, G., Burton, M. and Brennan, D. (2009), Capitalized amenity value of urban wetlands: a hedonic property price approach to urban wetlands in Perth, Western Australia*. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 53: 527-545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2009.00464.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2009.00464.x

[15] Tong Lingling, Wei Xiaoyan, Song Xiuhua, et al. Research on the value and influencing factors of urban wetland ecosystem services in Xining based on a dual model of hedonic pricing and structural equation modeling [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(11): 4630–4639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb202108042132

[16] Zhao Chenyu, Zhao Sijie, Jiang Ni, et al. Comprehensive performance assessment of wetlands around Dianchi Lake based on ecosystem service value accounting [J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2024, 37(5): 1071–1079. DOI: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2024.02.08.

[17] Wang Lishuai, Xu Shiwen, Lin Haowen, et al. Comprehensive performance assessment of an urban wetland park after construction: A case study of Daguan Wetland in Guangzhou [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(16): 6001–6016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201812042645

[18] Guangzhou Tianhe Smart City Core Area Regulatory Detailed Planning [J]. Urbanism and Architecture, 2017, (27): 64–68. DOI: 10.19892/j.cnki.csjz.2017.27.013.

[19] Feng Xia, Li Chengren, Wei Jiali, et al. Investigation of ecosystem service functions of Daguan Wetland in Guangzhou [J]. Modern Horticulture, 2020, 43(7): 40–41. DOI: 10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy.2020.07.019.

[20] Pei Li. Research on the Planning and Design of Urban Green Spaces in the Core Area of Tianhe Smart City, Guangzhou, under the Sponge City Framework [D]. South China University of Technology, 2017.

[21] Chen Geng, Zhu Daolin, Su Yayi, et al. The impact of large urban park green spaces on residential property prices: A case study of Beijing Olympic Forest Park [J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(11): 2202–2210.

[22] Guangzhou Municipal Development and Reform Commission. Notice of the Guangzhou Municipal Development and Reform Commission on Issues Concerning the Reform of Tap Water Prices in the Central Urban Area [2025].

[23] Tender Announcement for the 2025–2027 Tianhe Wetland Park Landscaping and Maintenance Project (CZ2024-5084).

[24] Guangzhou Municipal Planning and Natural Resources Bureau. https://ghzyj.gz.gov.cn/ywpd/cxgh/ghxkgsgb/phgbnew/gbt/2025/content/post_10790669.html

[25] Overall Territorial Spatial Plan of Tianhe District, Guangzhou (2021–2035). https://www.thnet.gov.cn/zwgk/ghjh/content/post_10726854.html

[26] Environmental Impact Assessment Report for Phase I of the Smart Water System Connectivity Project (Eastern Water System) in Tianhe Smart City, Guangzhou (Submission Draft), 2015.4.