Research on High-Quality Integration of the Economy of Digit and Green Economy

Xueyu Shi

doi:10.54097/2evazt37

Authors

Xueyu Shi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/2evazt37

Keywords:

Economy of Digit, Green Economy, Integrated Development

Abstract

With the continuous advancement of technology in China, the industrial landscape has been transformed by the economy of digit, which simultaneously provides sustained momentum for global economic growth. From the initial stages of cloud computing to big data technology, as well as artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things, these technologies have accelerated the transformation of the economic society. However, due to various objective factors, global environmental issues have become increasingly severe, with climate change, resource depletion, and environmental problems sounding alarms for humanity. Economic development and environmental protection should complement each other rather than oppose one another. Therefore, under such circumstances, relevant stakeholders should explore the convergence points between the green economy and the economy of digit, strategically combining them to fully leverage the advantages of digital technologies, harness the potential value of resources, and reduce environmental pollution. Hence, in the future development process, while improving economic efficiency, green concepts should also be integrated to ultimately achieve a win-win situation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Huang, X.; Xiao, H.; Wang, X. High-quality development of state-owned enterprises. China Ind. Econ. 2018, 3, 25–35.

[2] Tapscott, D. The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1996.

[3] Benkler, Y. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Inf. Econ. Policy 2006, 19, 278–282.

[4] Chen, X.; Yang, X. The influence of digital economy development on industrial structure upgrading. Reform 2021, 7, 32–46.

[5] Satbyulek, H.O.; Yeorac, K. A new approach to measuring green growth: Application to the OECD and Korea. Futures 2014, 15, 75–91.

[6] Zhao, T. Digital economy, entrepreneurial activity and quality development. Manag. World 2020, 9, 65–75.

[7] Ordieres-Meré, J.; Prieto, R.T.; Rubio, J. Digitalization: An opportunity for contributing to sustainability from knowledge creation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1460.

[8] Hylving, L.; Ola, H.; Lisen, S. The role of dominant design in a product developing firm’s digital innovation. J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. 2012, 13, 5–21.

[9] Toshiyukis, S. Damage store turn with a possible occurrence of eco-technology innovation measured by DEA environmental assessment. J. Econ. Struct. 2017, 35, 69–93.

[10] Michael, E.; Raynor, C.; Cotteleer, M. The more things change. Deloitte Rev. 2015, 17, 50–65.

[11] Chen, X. The direction and path of the digital economy affecting industrial structure evolution. Econ. Dly. 2021, 5, 21.

[12] Santarius, T.; Pohl, J.; Lange, S. Digitization and the decoupling debate: Can ICT help to reduce environmental impacts while the economy keeps growing. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7496–7515.

[13] Basu, S.; Fernald, J. Information and communications technology as a general purpose technology: Evidence from US industry data. Ger. Econ. Rev. 2007, 8, 146–173.

[14] Jorgenson, D.W.; Jon, M.S.; Stiroh, K.J. Industry origins of the American productivity resurgence. Econ. Syst. Res. 2007, 19, 79–98.

[15] Zhu, J.; Yang, Z. The connotation and evaluation of high-quality development in regional industries. Soc. Sci. Rev. 2020, 15, 50–59.

[16] Zhao, Y.; Chen, G. The green development path of industry. Southwest Financ. 2021, 10, 85–96.