Research on the Evaluation of Competitiveness of Steel Industry Enterprises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/zsqyw997Keywords:
Steel Industry Enterprises, Enterprise competitivenessAbstract
The steel industry, as a fundamental industry in the organic development framework of China's economy, has been facing the long-standing problems of production exceeding consumption, high asset liability ratio, severe product homogenization competition, and high pollution and carbon emissions in the production process in recent times. At the same time, due to the impact of the sluggish demand caused by the COVID-19, the rapid rise in the cost of raw materials such as iron ore, and the gradual disappearance of a series of policy dividends such as supply side reform, the financial situation of steel enterprises is becoming more and more pessimistic. How to cope with the increasing financial risks and gain competitive advantages through strengthening financial competitiveness in the fierce market competition has become a major issue that China's steel enterprises urgently need to solve. This article selects steel industry enterprises as the research object for analysis. By reviewing relevant literature on enterprise competitiveness, the relevant concepts of enterprise competitiveness are extracted, and the research results and evaluation system are organized. Based on factor analysis, 16 targeted indicators are selected based on scale, efficiency, growth, operational capacity, debt paying capacity, and research and development capacity. An analysis model is constructed and analysis conclusions are drawn. In the analysis results, problems are identified regarding the poor competitiveness of steel industry enterprises. The following research results were obtained: 1) The overall competitiveness score of enterprises in the industry is not high, all less than 1. Among them, operational capability has the greatest impact on the competitiveness of steel industry enterprises, followed by scale, debt paying ability, efficiency, research and development ability, and growth. 2) The worst scoring indicators among the six enterprise competitiveness indicators are the scale indicator and the growth indicator. There is a significant gap in industry scale, with 12 companies scoring positive in the scale factor, accounting for 34.29% of the industry; The scale factor score of 23 enterprises is negative, with an industry proportion of 65.71%. In addition, there are growth indicators, with 12 companies in the industry having positive growth factor scores and 23 companies having negative growth factor scores, indicating a significant head effect on overall growth capacity.
Downloads
References
[1] BARNEY.J. 2002. Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage [J]. Prentice Hall.
[2] DONALD G. MCFETRIDGE. 1995. Competitiveness: concepts and ensures [J]. Carleton University(5).
[3] JINN. TSAIRTENG, GRALD, THOMPSON. 1996. Optimal strategies for general Price-quality Decision models of news Products with learning Production costs [J]. European Journal Of Operational Research(93):476-489.
[4] Li WEI DONG. 2006. Research On the complexity of enterprise competitiveness [J]. International Journal of Business and management.
[5] MAKADOK.R. 2001. Toward a Synthesis of the Resource-based and Dynamic-capability Views of Rent Creation [J], Strategic Management Journal(22):387-401.
[6] MICHAEL A. 2001. Direct and Moderating Effects of Human Capital on Strategy and Performance in professional service firm:a resource-based perspective [J]. Academy of Management Journal.
[7] PETERAL, BARNEY, OLIVE. 2007. An Issue Management Approach to Understand Corporate Responsibility Standards for the Forest products industry [J]. Forest Products Journal(12):86-91.
[8] PRAHALAD.C.K and G.HAMEL. 1990. The Core Competence of the Corporation [J]. Harvard Business5(7):56-60.
[9] THOMAS. W.Y. MAN, THERESALAU, K.F. CHAN. 2002. The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises:A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies [J]. Journal of Business Venturing(17):123-142.
[10] Yin LIU YING. 1997. Employ Management By Constraints to Improve the Competitive Edge for Chinese Steel Market [J]. International Symposium on Steel Industry Development and Management.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.