Research on the Commercialization Strategy of University Scientific and Technological Achievements Based on the Triple Helix

Yan Song

doi:10.54097/srkrrv98

Authors

Yan Song

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/srkrrv98

Keywords:

Scientific and technological achievements, Commercialization, Triple Helix

Abstract

In the era of globalization and knowledge economy, science and technology and innovation have become the core engine of regional economic development. As important suppliers of scientific and technological achievements, Chinese universities still have many problems in commercialization of their scientific and technological achievements. Based on the triple helix theory, this paper analyzes the current situation and dilemma of the commercialization of Chinese universities' scientific and technological achievements, and then proposes to build a commercialization system of universities' scientific and technological achievements based on the Triple Helix, clarifies the functions of universities, enterprises and the government, establishes a synergistic mechanism of cooperation, and optimizes the supportive environment of the triple helix system, in order to promote the in-depth fusion of regional collaborative innovation and the commercialization of the scientific and technological achievements of universities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix--University-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST review, 14(1), 14-19.

[2] Amaral, M., Cai, Y., Perazzo, A. R., Rapetti, C., & Piqué, J. M. (2024). The Legacy of Loet Leydesdorff to the Triple Helix as a Theory of Innovation. Triple Helix, 9(1), 161-187.

[3] Dzakiy, U. N., Matsuura, Y., Simatupang, T. M., & Prasetio, E. A. (2024). Practical model of technology commercialisation at an Indonesian University: A case study from Institut Teknologi Bandung. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(3), 100341.

[4] Markham, S. K., Ward, R. J., Aiman-Smith, R., & Kingon, R. I. (2010). The valley of death as context for role theory in product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(3), 402-417.

[5] Ferdinands, R., Azam, S. M. F. and Khatibi, A. (2024), "The work in progress of a developing nation’s Triple Helix and its impact on patent commercialization. The case of Sri Lanka", Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 839-862.

[6] Chinta, R., & Culpan, R. (2014). The role of open innovation in business-university R&D collaborations. Palgrave Macmillan US, pp. 145-165

[7] Bai, X. J., Li, Z. Y., & Zeng, J. (2020). Performance evaluation of china's innovation during the industry-university-research collaboration process—an analysis basis on the dynamic network slacks-based measurement model. Technology in Society, 62.

[8] Fan, L. S., Kumar, S., Sunny, A. A., Joshi, R. K., Mohapatra, P., Joshi, A. S., & Marashdeh, Q. (2024). Multiphase entrepreneurship: an academic reflection. Powder Technology, 439, 119654.