Carbon Emissions Trading and Corporate Green Technology Innovation

Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Authors

  • Cheng Fu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v10i1.9859

Keywords:

Carbon emission trading, Green technology innovation, Carbon price, Carbon market liquidity, Carbon trading scale.

Abstract

Green technology innovation is the cornerstone of achieving green and high-quality development and an important guarantee for China to achieve the goals of "carbon neutrality" and "carbon emission reduction". As a market-oriented environmental policy, the carbon emission trading policy can affect the behavior of enterprises, and its impact on green technology innovation of enterprises deserves in-depth study. Based on the green patent data of A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2021, taking the carbon trading pilot policy as a quasi-natural experiment, this paper establishes a multi-point difference-in-differences model to explore the impact of carbon trading policy on green technology innovation of enterprises and discusses the regulatory role from the perspective of the carbon price, carbon market liquidity, and carbon market size. Finally, we also conduct a heterogeneity analysis based on the differences in the micro-characteristics of enterprises. The results show that the carbon trading policy significantly promotes the green technology innovation activities of enterprises; The role of carbon emission rights in facilitating enterprises to expand their green technology innovation is stronger for those with higher carbon price, as well as larger carbon trading scale. The market mechanism measured by the liquidity of the carbon market partially explains the promotion role of green technology innovation. Further heterogeneity analysis shows that the promotion effect of carbon trading policy on green technology innovation is mainly reflected in non-high-tech enterprises, low-carbon enterprises, and enterprises with high internal control quality. Therefore, we should give play to the incentive role of the carbon price and carbon trading scale, optimize the design of the carbon market system, provide targeted green innovation support for enterprises, and help to achieve carbon emission reduction and green high-quality development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Commission E. Eco-innovation Action Plan[M]. Brussels:2011.

Jiang L, He S, Zhou H. Coordination between sulfur dioxide pollution control and rapid economic growth in China: evidence from satellite observations and spatial econometric models[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2021. 57, 279–291.

Kneller, R&E, Manderson. Environmental Regulations and Innovation Activity in UK Manufacturing Indus- tries[J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2012, 34(2): 211-235.

Porter,M. America’s Green Strategy[J]. Scientific American, 1991, 264(4): 193-246.

Wang H.,Chen Z.,Wu X. Can a carbon trading system promote the transformation of a low-carbon economy under the framework of the porter hypothesis?—empirical analysis based on the PSM-DID method[J]. Energy Policy, 2019. 129, 930–938.

Wei Zhang, Guoxiang Li, Fanyong Guo. Does carbon emissions trading promote green technology innovation in China?[J]. Applied Energy, 2022.

Zhu J, Fan Y, Deng X,et al. Low-carbon Innovation Induced by Emissions Trading in China[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 1-8.

Deng F,Wang L. Research on the mechanism of environmental control to force industrial restructuring--a new perspective based on the decomposition of polluting and clean industries[J]. Ecological Economics,2020,36(06):142-150.

Liu W, Tong J, Xue J. Industry heterogeneity, environmental regulation and industrial technology innovation[J]. Scientific Research Management, 2017, 38(05):1-11.

Liu Y. Research on the impact of carbon emission trading policy on green technology innovation of listed enterprises[D]. Northeastern Petroleum University, 2022.

Qi S, Lin D, Cui J. Can environmental equity trading market induce green innovation? -- Evidence based on green patent data of listed companies in China[J]. Economic Research, 2018, 53(12):129-143.

Qi S, Yang G, Wang B. Study on the impact of carbon price on the trade competitiveness of covered industries in China[J]. China Population - Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(4): 107-115.

Song D., Zhu W., Wang B. Micro empirical evidence of carbon trading pilot covered enterprises in China:carbon emissions trading, allowance allocation methods and corporate green innovation[J]. China Population-Resources and Environment, 2021, 31(01): 37-47.

Wang B, Zhao C. Green technology innovation in China--Patent statistics and influencing factors [J]. Industrial Technology Economics, 2019, 38(07):53-66.

Wang W, Wang D, Lu N. A study on the mechanism of carbon emission trading for low-carbon technology innovation in China [J]. China Population-Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(02): 41-48.

Wei L, Ren L. Can carbon emissions trading promote enterprises' green technology innovation--based on the perspective of carbon price[J]. Lanzhou Journal, 2021,(07)

Wu Y, Qi J, Xian Q, Chen J. A study on the carbon emission reduction effect of China's carbon market--based on the synergistic effect of market mechanism and administrative intervention[J]. China Industrial Economics,2021,(08):114-132.

Xu J, Cui J. Low carbon cities and enterprise green technology innovation[J]. China Industrial Economy,2020,(12):178-196.

Xu L, Ma Y, Wang X. A study on environmental policy choice of green technology innovation based on evolutionary boxpen: government action vs. public participation[J]. China Management Science. 2022, 30(03): 30-42.

Yao C, Zeng Y. Carbon market effectiveness and its evaluation index system--based on the perspective of efficient market hypothesis[J]. Lanzhou Journal,2019,(12):114-122.

Yi L, Li Cg, Yang L, Liu J. A comparative study on the development degree of seven major carbon trading pilots in China [J]. China Population-Resources and Environment, 2018, 28(02): 134-140.

Yu Y, Zhang S, Lin B. The impact of target accountability system on China's high-quality economic development--a major practice of economic governance of the Communist Party of China[J]. China Economics,2022, (01):368-370.

Downloads

Published

17-07-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Fu, C. (2023). Carbon Emissions Trading and Corporate Green Technology Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 10(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v10i1.9859

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1170

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.