Methods for Testing the Significance of Differences in Biological Testing

Authors

  • Baoqin Jiang
  • Dejie Feng
  • Jing Ren
  • Chanchan An
  • Yan Liu
  • Qinqin Wei
  • Huanhuan Zheng
  • Xin Chen
  • Hongyan Jin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/03w3g213

Keywords:

Significance of Differences, Paired T-test, Wilcoxon Matching Signature Level Test, Normal Distribution, Bioassay

Abstract

Bioassays play a crucial role in the research of new drugs and vaccines. The significance test for differences is the most commonly used statistical method in the analysis of biometric data. The methods for testing the significance of differences in paired samples can be broadly divided into two categories. The first category is that the data population follows a normal distribution, and the commonly used method is paired t-test; The second type requires the use of nonparametric testing methods for statistical testing when parameter testing methods are not applicable. Commonly used methods include Wilcoxon matched signature level testing. This article introduces the basic principles and prerequisites of two types of testing methods, and in establishing a detection method for trypsin residue, takes the significance of the difference between the results of three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests at 36℃ and the results at 37℃ for two batches of raw materials as an example to explain the correct use of the two testing methods. Correctly applying significance testing can establish the conclusions of experiments or investigations on a more scientific and reliable basis, avoiding simplification and absolutization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

West RM. Best practice in statistics: Use the Welcht-test when testing the difference between two groups. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry. 2021;58(4):267-9.

Mishra P, Pandey C, Singh U, Gupta A, Keshri A. Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. 2019;22(1):67-72.

Vieira PCDC. T-Test with Likert Scale Variables. Social Science Electronic Publishing. 2016.

Trajkovski VE. HOW TO SELECT APPROPRIATE STATISTICAL TEST IN SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES. Faculty of Philosophy, Institute of Special Education. 2016;(17).

Spottiswoode CN, Olsson U, Mills MSL, Cohen C, Francis JE, Toye N, et al. Rediscovery of a long-lost lark reveals the conspecificity of endangeredHeteromirafrapopulations in the Horn of Africa. Journal of Ornithology. 2013;154(3):813-25.

Takada Y, Shiotome N. ROBUSTNESS OF A TWO-STAGE ESTIMATION PROCEDURE WHEN VARIANCES ARE UNEQUAL. Sequential Analysis. 2012;34(3):336-49.

Ruxton GD. The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Behavioral Ecology. 2010;17(4):688-90.

Neuh, aauml, ser, Markus. Two-sample test when variances are unequal. Animal Behaviour. 2002.

Ugoni A, Walker B. THE t TEST: An Introduction. 1995;4.

Murphy BP. Some two-sample tests when the variances are unequal: a simulation study. Biometrika. 1967;(3-4):3-4.

Green KCE. Analysis of Variance: Is There a Difference in Means and What Does It Mean? Journal of Surgical Research. 2008.

Stroes-Gascoyne S, Schippers A, Schwyn B, Poulain S, Sergeant C, Simonoff M, et al. Microbial Community Analysis of Opalinus Clay Drill Core Samples from the Mont Terri Underground Research Laboratory, Switzerland. Geomicrobiology Journal. 2007;24(1):1-17.

Downloads

Published

27-04-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Jiang, B., Feng, D., Ren, J., An, C., Liu, Y., Wei, Q., Zheng, H., Chen, X., & Jin, H. (2024). Methods for Testing the Significance of Differences in Biological Testing. International Journal of Biology and Life Sciences, 5(3), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.54097/03w3g213