The Impact of ChatGPT on Ideological and Political Work in Chinese Universities: A Comprehensive Study

Shengyu Gu

doi:10.54097/5z130b75

Authors

Shengyu Gu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/5z130b75

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence in Education, Ideological and Political Education, ChatGPT Impact Analysis.

Abstract

This study explores the impact of ChatGPT, an advanced artificial intelligence (AI) tool, on Ideological and Political Education (IPE) in Chinese universities. Amidst the growing integration of AI in educational settings, this research provides critical insights into the applications and implications of AI technologies in the realm of IPE. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study combines quantitative data from surveys with qualitative insights from interviews and focus groups, involving students, faculty, and administrators across various universities. Objectives: The primary objectives were to assess the integration of ChatGPT in IPE, evaluate its impact on student engagement and learning, explore the socio-political implications, and investigate the ethical considerations of AI use in education. Methods: The research employed stratified random sampling for surveys and purposive sampling for interviews and focus groups. Statistical analysis was used to interpret the quantitative data, while thematic analysis was applied to the qualitative data. Findings: The study revealed that ChatGPT enhances the diversity and depth of content delivery in IPE, leading to increased student engagement and improved understanding of complex ideological concepts. However, it also highlighted the necessity of ethical considerations and the potential challenges of AI in shaping socio-political dynamics within educational contexts. Conclusions: ChatGPT's integration into IPE offers promising avenues for enriching educational content and pedagogy. However, it also necessitates careful consideration of ethical implications and socio-political impacts. The study contributes to the growing body of literature on AI in education and provides recommendations for educators, policymakers, and future research in this evolving field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychological Association.

Bates, T. (2020). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Tony Bates Associates Ltd.

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.

Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The ethics of artificial intelligence. In The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 316-334). Cambridge University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs (pp. 57-71). American Psychological Association.

Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., ... & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165.

Chen, X., & Wang, L. (2018). Ideological and political education in China's higher education. International Journal of Educational Development, 61, 12-20.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

Denzin, N. K. (2017). Triangulation in qualitative research. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed., pp. 297-314). SAGE Publications.

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-399.

Johnson, L., Smith, R., & Sanderson, N. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Integrative Learning and Educational Innovation.

Li, C., & Lalani, F. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. This is how. World Economic Forum.

Liu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2021). Student engagement in long-distance ideological and political education: A Chinese perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(3), 405-417.

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2017). Higher Education in China.

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge.

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.

Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books.

Smith, R., & Sanderson, N. (2020). Chatbots in education: A passing trend or valuable pedagogical tool? Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2831-2854.

Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2020). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 357-388.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem-solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., ... & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 5998-6008).

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, L., & Zheng, L. (2019). The role of higher education in China: Social and cultural perspectives. International Education Studies, 12(7), 29-38.

Wang, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39.

Zhang, Q., & Zhou, L. (2020). Educating the digital generation: Early childhood educators' attitudes towards digital technology in China. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 36-49.

Zhao, Y. (2019). What China can teach the world about education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(3), 353-366.