A Cross-Linguistic Study of Stance Strategies in Abstracts of Linguistics Articles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/64kery15Keywords:
Academic abstract, Stance, Metadiscourse.Abstract
Abstracts, serving as concise summaries of academic papers, directly influence readers' interest, impressions, and evaluations of the main text. Stance markers constitute essential metadiscourse resources for conveying the author's stance and commitment of proposal within academic discourse. However, previous research has shown insufficient attention to how advanced second language learners and native speakers construct author stance features in the linguistic domain, particularly in the context of abstracts in journal articles. Building upon this premise, this study examines English abstracts from both Chinese and international linguistics journals to comparatively analyze the differing strategies employed by Chinese and international linguists when using stance markers in abstract writing. The findings reveal that English abstracts published in international linguistics journals exhibit a greater quantity and variety of stance markers compared to those in Chinese linguistics journals, with hedges and self-mention notably more prevalent in the former. This paper further delves into the differences in the use of stance markers between Chinese and international linguists, taking cultural and educational backgrounds, linguistic structures, the demands of international communication, and authors' levels of confidence and language proficiency into consideration.
Downloads
References
Crosthwaite, Peter, Lisa Cheung, and Feng Kevin Jiang. "Writing with attitude: Stance expression in learner and professional dentistry research reports." English for specific purposes 46 (2017): 107-123.
Gilmore, Alexander, and Neil Millar. "The language of civil engineering research articles: A corpus-based approach." English for Specific Purposes 51 (2018): 1-17.
Hunston, Susan, and Geoffrey Thompson, eds. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford University Press, UK, 2000.
Hyland, Ken. "Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles." Written communication 18.4 (2001): 549-574.
Hyland, Ken. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004.
Hyland, Ken. "Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse." Discourse studies 7.2 (2005a): 173-192.
Hyland, Ken. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum, 2005b.
Hyland, Ken, and Feng Kevin Jiang. "Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance." Written communication 33.3 (2016): 251-274.
Hyland, Ken, and Feng Kevin Jiang. "“In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. "English for Specific Purposes 51 (2018): 18-30.
Lee, Joseph J., and Lydia Deakin. "Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays." Journal of second language writing 33 (2016): 21-34.
McGrath, Lisa, and Maria Kuteeva. "Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices." English for Specific Purposes 31.3 (2012): 161-173.
Myers, Greg. "The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles." Applied linguistics 10.1 (1989): 1-35.
Yang, Wenhsien. "Evaluative language and interactive discourse in journal article highlights." English for Specific Purposes 42 (2016): 89-103.
Yang, Yingli. "Exploring linguistic and cultural variations in the use of hedges in English and Chinese scientific discourse." Journal of Pragmatics 50.1 (2013): 23-36.
Li, Zhi, & Cheng, Xiaomin. "A Comparative Study of Stance Markers in English Abstracts of Chinese and Foreign Academic Journals." Journal of Xi'an International Studies University, 28.02 (2020): 6-10. doi:10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1457/h.2020.02.002.
Liang, Maocheng. "A Study of Modal Sequences in English Writing of Chinese University Students." Foreign Language Teaching and Research: Bimonthly of Foreign Languages, 1 (2008): 51-58.
Wu, Geqi. "A Comparative Study of Authorial Stance Markers in the Conclusion Section of English-Chinese Research Papers." Journal of Xi'an International Studies University, 18.04 (2010): 46-50. doi:10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1457/h.2010.04.013.
Xu, Fang. "A Study on Authorial Stance Markers in Second Language Academic Discourse." Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 5 (2015): 1-7.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Education and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.