Pedagogical Interaction and Student Engagement at Selected University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/42w7v103Keywords:
Pedagogical Interaction, Student Engagement, Sustainable Professional DevelopmentAbstract
This quantitative study examined pedagogical interaction and student engagement in a university in Guangdong, China, involving 364 students and 132 teachers. Surveys evaluated pedagogical strategies, including reflective, inquiry-based, and collaborative learning, alongside cognitive, emotional, and behavioral aspects of student engagement. Professional development was measured by the establishment of training systems aimed at enhancing students' capacity to engage in classroom interactions, ensuring that teachers progressively cultivate active participation.The findings show that teachers frequently facilitate teamwork, reflect on their teaching practices, and set clear expectations for group activities. They also promote inquiry-based learning by fostering interactive environments where students exchange ideas and engage in discussions. In problem-based learning settings, teachers guide students through research, data analysis, and presentations. However, Spearman’s rho correlation analysis found no significant relationship between teaching strategies and student engagement, suggesting that changes in one do not necessarily affect the other. This indicates that factors beyond pedagogy, such as student motivation or external influences, may impact engagement. The study highlights the need for more personalized learning approaches and enhanced support systems to encourage participation. And, continuous professional development remains crucial, ensuring educators can create environments that nurture meaningful student engagement, regardless of instructional strategies used.
Downloads
References
[1] Abrar, U. & Sajid A. (2020) The Effective Use of Information Technology and Interactive Activities to Improve Learner Engagement, Education Science.(10).349.
[2] Afshan N. , Saba B., Mumtaz A. (2023) A Study of Teachers’ Reflections on their Teaching , Bulletin of Education and Research, Vol. 45, No.3 pp. 65-81
[3] Azevedo, R. (2015). Defining and Measuring Engagement and Learning in Science: Conceptual,Theoretical, Methodological, and Analytical Issues. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 84-94.
[4] Cash, A. H., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). The Role of Scheduling in Observing Teacher-Child Interactions. School Psychology Review, 43(4), 428-449.
[5] Catherine A., Nathan B., Erin M. (2021)The Positive Influence of Inquiry-Based Learning Teacher Professional Learning and Industry Partnerships on Student Engagement with STEM, Frontier Education, (6)
[6] Chikileva, L. S. Characteristic Features of Pedagogical Interaction in Teaching a Foreign Language at a Non-linguistic University. Humanities and Social Sciences.
[7] Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B., Giuliani, S., Luck, M., Underwood, P. S., Schatschneider, C. (2011).Testing the Impact of Child Characteristics Instruction Interactions on Third Graders' Reading Comprehension by Differentiating literacy instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 189-221.
[8] Collin, S., & Karsenti, T. (2011). The Collective Dimension of Reflective Practice: How and why? Reflective Practice, 12(4), 569-581.
[9] Costa, C., Cardoso, A., Lima, M., Ferreira, M., & Abrantes, J. L. (2015). Pedagogical Interaction and Learning Performance as Determinants of AcademicAchievement.Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 874-881.
[10] Cotten, S.R., Wilson, B. Student–faculty Interactions: Dynamics and Determinants.High Education 51, 487–519 (2006).
[11] Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2020). Learner Engagement in MOOCs: Scale Development and Validation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 245-262.
[12] Downer, J., Sabol, T. J., & Hamre, B. (2010). Teacher-child Interactions in the Classroom: Toward a Theory of with in and Cross-domain Links to Children's Developmental outcomes. Early Education and Development, 21(5), 699-6723.
[13] Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. .School Engagement:Potential of the Concept,State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
[14] Gillies, R., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 933–940.
[15] Gholam, A. (2019). Inquiry-based learning: Student Teachers’ Challenges and Perceptions. Journal of Inquiry & Action in Education, 10(2), 34-59.
[16] Guo Jidong; Zhou Mo; Liu Xiaohong (2022) Components of EFL Learners' Perceived Multi-Interaction Value and Its Relationships With Behavioral Engagement and Academic Achievement. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching(05),43-52+145-146.
[17] Hargreaves, D. (1986). Interpersonal Relationships in Education. Madrid: Narcea Ediciones
[18] Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S. & Bélisle, M. (2021) An Examination of Teachers’ Strategies to Foster Student Engagement in Blended Learning in Higher Education.
[19] Huang, T.P, Zheng, Q.M., & Li, S.B. (2016). Classroom Behavior Interaction Between Teachers and Students and Optimization Strategies. Theory and Practice of Education, 36(32), 54-56.
[20] Halverson, Lisa R.& Graham, Charles R. (2019). Learner Engagement in Blended Learning Environments: A Conceptual Framework,Online Learning, v23n2.145-178.
[21] Harm Peters, Marko Zdravkovic. (2018). Twelve Tips for Enhancing Student Engagement, Medical Teacher.1-6.
[22] Hayley Franklin, Ingrid Harrington (2019). A Review into Effective Classroom Management and Strategies for Student Engagement: Teacher and Student Roles in Today’s Classrooms, Journal of Education and Training Studies.Vol.7, No.12
[23] He, K. K. (2021). New Constructivist Theory: Critique, Absorption, and Innovative Development of Western Constructivism by Chinese Scholars.Chinese Education Science, 2021(1), 14-29.
[24] Heikonen, Lauri; Toom, Auli; Pyhältö, Kirsi; Pietarinen, Janne; Soini, Tiina (2017). Student-teachers’ Strategies in Classroom Interaction in the Context of the Teaching Practicum. Journal of Education for Teaching, 1–16.
[25] Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S. & Bélisle, M. (2021) An Examination of Teachers’ Strategies to Foster Student Engagement in Blended Learning in Higher Education.International Journal of Educational Technology in High Education 18, 25.
[26] Hoidn, S. & Reusser, K. (2020). Student-centered Learning Environments for Deeper Learning in Higher Education Classrooms.The International Handbook of Student-centered Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.Routledge.
[27] Hoover, Nancy R., and Lisa M. Abrams, (2013). Teachers’ Instructional Use of Summative Student Assessment Data, Applied Measurement in Education, Vol. 26.
[28] Huang, R., Yang, W., & Li, H. (2019). On the Road to Participatory Pedagogy: A Mixed Methods Study of Pedagogical Interaction in Chinese Kindergartens. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 81-91.
[29] Huang, T.P, Zheng, Q.M., & Li, S.B. (2016). Classroom Behavior Interaction Between Teachers and Students and Optimization Strategies. Theory and Practice of Education, 36(32), 54-56.
[30] Kompakt Interaction and Relationship Design with Children. Kindergarten today. Knowledge. GmbH: Herder Verlag.
[31] Kelly, P.A., Haidet, P., Schneider, V., Searle, N., Seidel, C.L., Richards, B.F. A Comparison of In-class Learner Engagement Across Lecture, Problem-Based Learning, and Team Learning Using the STROBE Classroom Observation Tool. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2005, 17, 112–118.
[32] Lambert, C., & Zhang, G. (2019). Engagement in the Use of English and Chinese as Foreign Languages: The Role of Learner-generated Content in Instructional Task Design. The Modern Language Journal, 2019(2)
[33] Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New Conceptual Frameworks for Student Engagement Research, Policy, and Practice. Review of Educational Research,2013(3).
[34] Pianta, R. C., LaParo, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring system. Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
[35] Weltzien, D. (2016). Interaction and Relationship Design with Children. Kindergarten Today. Knowledge Compact. GmbH: Herder Verlag.
[36] Young, M. R. (2005). The Motivational Effects of the Classroom Environment in Facilitating Self-regulated Space. Social and Behavioral Sciences,11, 54-61.
[37] Vladimir P. B., Olga V. G., Viktor N. P., & Liudmila V. P. Principle Of Pedagogical Interaction In The Digita Learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(1),25-40.
[38] Wang,C.M.(2011).The Mechanism of Promoting Learning in Computer-Assisted Foreign Language Teaching. (06), 14-18.
[39] Wang, J.F.(2012). A Study on the Theory of Teacher -Student Interaction and Its Practical Effectiveness. Henan Social Sciences, 20(06), 75-77.
[40] Xu, J. F (2020). Composition and Cultivation of Independent Learning Ability of Students in Foreign LanguagMajors. Foreign Language World, (6), 26-32.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Education and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.