Assessing the Impact of University Teachers' Digital Leadership on Enhancing Student Learning Effectiveness

Peipei Dong; RHENE C. TABAJEN

doi:10.54097/r5kxmh38

Authors

Peipei Dong
RHENE C. TABAJEN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/r5kxmh38

Keywords:

Digital Leadership, Technical Expertise Creative, Teaching Methods Promotion of Digital Literacy, Decision-Making, Ethical Considerations in Technology Use

Abstract

This research investigates the digital leadership exhibited by university instructors and its significant impact on students' learning effectiveness in higher education. Key aspects of digital leadership evaluated include technical expertise, innovative teaching methods, promotion of digital literacy, data-driven decision-making, and ethical technology use. Using a mixed-methods approach, data was collected through surveys and interviews with educators and students to assess the effectiveness of digital leadership strategies. Findings reveal that while instructors demonstrate moderate competence in technology and teaching methods, they excel in fostering digital literacy and ethical technology use. However, there is room for improvement in data-driven decision-making, which is crucial for enhancing learning efficacy. The study also examines students' learning outcomes related to digital literacy, engagement, metacognitive abilities, and analytical skills, finding modest improvements in these areas. A notable correlation exists between instructors' digital leadership and students' learning efficacy, particularly in data-driven decision-making and digital literacy promotion. Additionally, challenges faced by university educators include keeping up with technological advancements, effectively utilizing data, and maintaining student engagement in digital learning environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Ally, M. (2021). Mobile Learning: Transforming Education, Engaging Students, and Improving Outcomes. Commonwealth of Learning.

[2] Babbie, E. R. (2016). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.

[3] Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

[4] Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17-66). Springer.

[5] Blikstein, P., & Wilensky, U. (2011). An Overview of Artificial Intelligence in Education. In Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp.54-64). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9-6

[6] Celik, I., et al. (2023). Exploring the relationship between teachers’ competencies in AI-TPACK and digital proficiency. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.10 07/s10639-022-10859-8.

[7] Chen, B., et al. (2017). Teachers’ digital competence and its relations to teaching innovation: A study on Chinese elementary and middle school teachers. Computers & Education, 113, 41-54.

[8] Chen, B., et al. (2019). Teachers’ digital competence and its relations to teaching innovation: A study on Chinese elementary and middle school teachers. Computers & Education, 113, 41-54.

[9] Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.

[10] Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.

[11] Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Research findings and recommendations. The California Academic Press.

[12] Fegely, A., Winslow, J., Lee, C. Y., & Setari, A. P. (2023). EdTech Align: A valid and reliable instrument for measuring teachers’ EdTech competencies a ligned to professional standards. TechTrends, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00824-8

[13] Finger, G., & Jamieson-Proctor, R. (2010). Exploring Innovative Pedagogies in the Assessment of 21st Century Skills. In Curriculum, Learning, and Teaching Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (pp. 142-151). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.09.022

[14] Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M., & Ye, Y. (2013). Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(9), 751-762.

[15] Fullan, M. (2014). The Principal: Three Keys to Maximizing Impact. John Wiley & Sons.

[16] Gomez, F. C., Trespalacios, J., Hsu, Y. C., & Dazhi, Y. (2022). Exploring teachers’ technology integration self-efficacy through the 2017 ISTE standards. TechTrends, 66, 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00639-z

[17] Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K–12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x12463051

[18] Guo, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2021). A Study on University Teachers’ Digital Leadership in the Context of Educational Informatization in China. In Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (pp. 1-5). Atlantis Press.

[19] Hair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

[20] Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Insecurity. Teachers College Press.

[21] Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(3), 261-284.

[22] Healy, D., & Blade, E. (2020). AI and digital proficiency in education. International Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-10056-4

[23] Huang, R., Hu, Y., Yang, J., & Pataraia, N. (2021). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first-century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10009-7

[24] Hu, Y., & Li, Z. (2018). Development path and practical strategies of college eachers' digital leadership. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(2), 1213-1222.

[25] Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., … Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub. http://www.clrn.dmlhub.net/publications

[26] Kabakci Yurdakul, I., & Çoklar, A. N. (2023). Digital proficiency and teacher education. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10009-7

[27] Kim, J., & Lee, K. S. S. (2022). Conceptual model to predict Filipino teachers’ adoption of ICT-based instruction in class: Using the UTAUT model. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(4),699-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2028675

[28] Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Lim, W. Y. (2017). Teacher professional development for TPACK-21CL: Effects on teacher ICT integration and student outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(2), 172-196.