State estimation and slug flow control of subsea production systems

Authors

  • Chuan Wang
  • Xueliang Zhang
  • Huachuan Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/jceim.v10i1.5360

Keywords:

ODE model, EKF, BPNN, Slug control

Abstract

The simulation and control of the severe slugging flow in the subsea multiphase pipeline is the focus of research in the production and exploitation of oil companies. Severe slug flow results in severe fluctuations of pressure and flow rate at both the wells end and the receiving host processing facilities, causing safety and shutdown risks. To prevent the severe slugging flow regime in multiphase transport pipelines, an ODE model is established by using the mass conservation law for individual phases in the pipeline and the riser sections. Then, the proposed model is compared to the results from the OLGA simulation. A comparative study of different slugging flow control solutions is conducted. Extended Kalman Filter (EKF), Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) and EKF&BPNN are used for state estimation and combined with PI controller. The EKF and BPNN are good nonlinear filters. However, when the nominal choke opening is increased, they work unsatisfying. The EKF&BPNN observer shows slightly better results than EKF and BPNN when the system has high input disturbance.

References

R Stromquist, Gustafson S. SUBSIS -- world's first subsea separation and injection system[J]. ABB Review, 1998, (No.6): 4-13.

Massimo Benetti, Villa Marco. Two-phase separation/pumping to make subsea debut on Marimba. [J]. Offshore, 1998, (No.12): 46.

J-H Neuenkirchen. Tordis Subsea Separation Boosting and Injection (SSBI) Project: Project Presentation and Description of the Production Control System[A]//Neptune, France: 2006.

Chris Carpenter. Subsea Production Optimization in Field BC-10 Offshore Brazil. [J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2016, (No.5): 67-69.

M-L Euphemio, Lima I-F, Orlowski R, et al. Marlim SSAO 3-Phase Subsea Separation System: Project Overview and Execution Strategy[A]//Houston, TX(US): 2012.

Esmaeil Jahanshahi, Skogestad Sigurd. Simplified Dynamical Models for Control of Severe Slugging in Multiphase Risers[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2011, 44(1): 1634-1639.

Esmaeil Jahanshahi, Skogestad Sigurd, Helgesen Anette-H. Controllability analysis of severe slugging in well-pipeline-riser systems[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2012, 45(8): 101-108.

Gisle-Otto Eikrem, Imsland Lars, Foss Bjarne. Stabilization of Gas Lifted Wells Based on State Estimation[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2004, (No.1): 323-328.

Gisle-Otto Eikrem, Aamo Ole-Morten, Siahaan Hardy, et al. Anti-Slug control of gas-lift wells - Experimental results[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2004, (No.13): 799-804.

F Di Meglio, Kaasa G-O, Petit N, et al. Reproducing slugging oscillations of a real oil well[A]//Atlanta, GA: 2010.

F-A Di Meglio, Petit N-A, Alstad V-B, et al. Stabilization of slugging in oil production facilities with or without upstream pressure sensors (Article)[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2012, (No.4): 809-822.

Florent Di Meglio. Production de pétrole: étude dynamique et contrôle des écoulements à bouchons[D]. Dynamical Systems [math.DS]. École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, 2011.

Downloads

Published

21-02-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, C., Zhang, X., & Liu, H. (2023). State estimation and slug flow control of subsea production systems. Journal of Computing and Electronic Information Management, 10(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.54097/jceim.v10i1.5360

Similar Articles

1-10 of 91

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.