The time-varying co-movements between energy market and global financial market
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/jceim.v10i1.5763Keywords:
Spillover index, Energy market, Global financial market, Deep learningAbstract
Since the global financial crisis in 2008, international energy markets have become more closely linked to financial markets and energy prices have exhibited more financial characteristics. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the time-varying synergy between the energy market and the global financial market. This paper sets up a model for realizing the time-varying co-movements between energy markets and global financial markets: It uses the Diebold &Yilmaz spillover index method and its dynamic expansion model to test the spillover mechanism of market volatility shocks, applies the deep long and short-term memory (DLSTM) model to predict market prices. The results of this study show that, first, energy markets and global financial markets are closely linked networks, and the spillover effects have obvious time-varying characteristics. Second, from a static spillover perspective, the Global Financial Price Index shows the largest net exporter in both yield and volatility spillovers, suggesting that the global financial development market has the strongest influence on other markets. However, in the volatility spillover, the net spillover index shows alternating periods of positive and negative periods most of the time.
References
Zhang D, Ji Q. Energy finance: Frontiers and future development[J]. Energy Economics, 2019, 83: 290-292.
Chen N F, Roll R, Ross S A. Economic forces and the stock market[J]. Journal of business, 1986: 383-403.
Sadorsky P. Oil price shocks and stock market activity[J]. Energy economics, 1999, 21(5): 449-469.
Ågren M. Does oil price uncertainty transmit to stock markets?[R]. Working Paper, 2006.
Park J, Ratti R A. Oil price shocks and stock markets in the US and 13 European countries[J]. Energy economics, 2008, 30(5): 2587-2608.
Shahzad S J H, Mensi W, Hammoudeh S, et al. Extreme dependence and risk spillovers between oil and Islamic stock markets[J]. Emerging Markets Review, 2018, 34: 42-63.
Silvennoinen A, Thorp S. Financialization, crisis and commodity correlation dynamics[J]. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2013, 24: 42-65.
Sagheer A, Kotb M. Time series forecasting of petroleum production using deep LSTM recurrent networks[J]. Neurocomputing, 2019, 323: 203-213.
Antonakakis N, Chatziantoniou I, Gabauer D. Refined Measures of Dynamic Connectedness based on Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregressions[J]. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 2020, 13(4): 84.
Koop G, Pesaran M H, Potter S M. Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models[J]. Journal of econometrics, 1996, 74(1): 119-147.
Pesaran H H, Shin Y. Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models[J]. Economics letters, 1998, 58(1): 17-29.
Zhang D. Oil shocks and stock markets revisited: Measuring connectedness from a global perspective[J]. Energy Economics, 2017, 62: 323-333.
Kang S H, Maitra D, Dash S R, et al. Dynamic spillovers and connectedness between stock, commodities, bonds, and VIX markets[J]. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 2019, 58(November 2018): 101221.
Corbet S, Goodell J W, Günay S. Co-movements and spillovers of oil and renewable firms under extreme conditions: New evidence from negative WTI prices during COVID-19[J]. Energy economics, 2020, 92: 104978.
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning[J]. nature, 2015, 521(7553): 436-444.
Längkvist M, Karlsson L, Loutfi A. A review of unsupervised feature learning and deep learning for time-series modeling[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2014, 42: 11-24.
Abhyankar A, Xu B, Wang J. Oil price shocks and the stock market: evidence from Japan[J]. The Energy Journal, 2013, 34(2).
Su Z, Fang T, Yin L. Understanding stock market volatility: What is the role of US uncertainty?[J]. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2019, 48: 582-590.