Low energy characteristics and low carbon strategies for traditional timber framing in the full life cycle -The case studying on Tujia hanging foot in southwest Hubei

Pengcheng Miao; Zheyu Wang

doi:10.54097/jceim.v10i1.5770

Authors

Pengcheng Miao
Zheyu Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/jceim.v10i1.5770

Keywords:

Traditional wooden building, Whole building life cycle, Carbon emission

Abstract

The issue of carbon emissions has attracted a great deal of attention in recent years, both at home and abroad. There are also more and more people engaged in related research. In the field of architecture, more people are starting to look at the whole life cycle of buildings to explore energy saving and emission reduction of buildings. It is not just about exploring how to reduce the energy consumption of a building during its use. This paper will analyze the advantages of traditional wooden buildings and modern buildings in terms of low carbon from five perspectives: material selection, transportation, construction, use, transportation and demolition, and summarize the related strategies from a whole life cycle analysis of buildings.

References

Webster M D, Meryman H, Kestner D M. Carbon emissions and building structure: what the structural engineer needs to know about carbon in the 21st century[C]//Structures Congress 2011. 2011: 472-482.

He J, Yue Q, Li Y, et al. Driving force analysis of carbon emissions in China’s building industry: 2000–2015[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 60: 102268.

China Building Energy Consumption Research Report 2020[J]. Building Energy Efficiency (Chinese and English), 2021, 49 (02) : 1-6.

[USA] (1969) Rapputt, Amos. The Shape and Culture of the House. Beijing: China Architecture Industry Press, 2007:45-48.

Brunskill, R. W. (1978). Illustrated handbook of vernacular architecture.

Yang Weitong. Research on Low Carbon Design of rural Residential buildings in Luonan Based on the Whole Life Cycle [D]. Xi 'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2020.DOI:10.27393/d.cnki.gxazu.2020.001281.

Liu Jian-hao, YU Yi-fang. Low-carbon landscape in traditional rural settlements in Southwest China [J]. Chinese garden, 2010,26(10):84-86.

Wang Changbo, Zhang Xiaoxiao, Pang Mingyue. A Review of the Research on Life Cycle Evaluation Methods -- and the development and application of hybrid life cycle evaluation [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015,30(07):1232-1242.

Yan P F, Yang Jun. An improved method of environmental impact assessment and its application [J]. Environment and sustainable development.,2007(05): 10-12.DOI:10.19758 / j.cnki.issn1673-288x.2007.05.004.

Yang Qianmiao. Quantitative evaluation of the environmental impact of construction products in their whole life cycle [D]. Tianjin University, 2009.

Sun Y, Li X W. Simulation of summer monsoon environment and summer thermal environment of stilted houses in typical Tujia settlements in southeast Chongqing [J]. Journal of Western Human Settlement Environment, 2016,31(02):96-101.DOI:10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20160218.

Dong R J. Study on inheritance of natural ventilation of traditional villages and stilted buildings in western Hunan based on wind environment simulation [D]. Hunan University, 2020.DOI:10.27135/d.cnki.ghudu.2020.001480.

Boy resistance, Makemin. Effects of resident-employment distance on transportation carbon emissions [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012,32(10):2975-2984.

Xu Wan-ying, ZHOU Chuanbin, Chen Yong-gen, WANG Rusong. Carbon emission reduction benefit calculation of rural household biogas project: A case study of Enshi Prefecture, Hubei Province [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2013,29(04):449-453.