Supporting Teachers’ Retention Through Influence of Leadership Dimension and Job Satisfaction Towards the Principle of Best Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/0500dp52Keywords:
Leadership, Teaches’ Job Satisfaction, Leadership AbilityAbstract
This study determined the leadership dimension of the school administrators as the entry point to explore the influence on teachers' job satisfaction and their decision for retention. This study collected questionnaire data of teachers from 5 universities in Guangxi Province, sorted out and analyzed the demographic characteristics of teachers, the self-evaluation of teachers' job satisfaction, the evaluation of school administrators' leadership ability, and the correlation and differences of related factors. The research results show that administrators' leadership dimensions seem to work against teachers' differing personalities. The researcher recommends encouraging teachers to open dialogue with school administrators; school administrators could initiate activities for team building and provide training to attain esprit de corp and nurture collegiality on the campus that can resonate in the faculty rooms and classrooms. This fosters a culture of belonging within the learning environment and invites regular resource persons for personal and professional guidance to address individual issues.
Downloads
References
Barbuto, J. E. (2005). Motivation and transactional, charismatic, and transformational leadership: A test of antecedents. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(4), 26-40.
Barbuto, J. E., & Hayden, R. W. (2011). Testing relationships between servant leadership dimensions and leader member exchange (LMX). Journal of Leadership Education, 10(2), 22-37.
Barbuto, J. E., & Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of se emotional and material rewardsrvant leadership. Group & Organization Management, 31, 300-326.
Bayram, H., & Dinç, S. (2015). Role of transformational leadership on employee's job satisfaction: The case of private universities in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Researcher, 93, 270-281. 108.
Bonhak, K. Yu, J.,Chua,B, LeeS, & Han , H. (2019) Relationship among material and emotional reward, job satisfaction, burnouts, affective commitment, job performance and turnover intention in Hotel industry. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism, 21(4). 371-401.
Bryant, S. E., (2003). The role of transformational and transactional leadership in creating, sharing, and exploiting organizational knowledge. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(4), 32-44.
Chang, C.-S., Liu, E. Z.-F., Sung, H.-Y., Lin, C.-H., Chen, N.-S., & Cheng, S.-S.
(2014). Effects of online college student's Internet self-efficacy on learning motivation and performance. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 51, 366-377. https://doi. org/ 10.1080/14703297.2013.771429 109.
Cronin, L. D., Arthur, C. A., Hardy, J., & Callow, N. (2015). Transformational leadership and task cohesion in sport: The mediating role of inside sacrifice. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 37(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2014-0116.
Darley-Baah, K. (2010). Job satisfaction and motivation: Understanding its impact on employee commitment and organizational performance. Academic Leadership, 8(4), 11.
Eaton, C. K., Osgood, A. K., Cigrand, D. L., & Dunbar, A.-M. L. (2015). Faculty perception of support to do their job well. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 10, 35-42. 110.
Engelbrecht, A. S., Heine, G., & Mahembe, B. (2014). The influence of ethical leadership on trust and work engagement: An exploratory study, South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 40(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/ 10.4102/ sajip.v 40i1. 1210.
Gao, Y(2021) An empirical study on the influence of principal’s reform leadership style on teachers’ attitude towards reform. Education Guide, 2021:2 41-50. 10.16215/j cnki. en 44-1371/g4.2021.02.006.
Hauserman, C. P., & Stick, S. L. (2013). The Leadership Teachers Want from Principals: Transformational. Canadian Journal of Education, 36(3), 184-203.
Johnsrud, L. K., & Rosser, V. J. (2002). Faculty members' morale and their intentions to leave: A multilevel explanation. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 518-542.
Jung, D. I. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and their effects on creativity in groups. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 185-195. Kelali, T., & Narula, S. (2015). Relationship between leadership styles and faculty job satisfaction (a review-based approach). International Journal of Science and Research, 6(3), 1917-1925.
Kovjanic, S., Schuh, S. C., & Jonas, K. (2013). Transformational leadership and performance: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of basic needs satisfaction and work engagement. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 86, 543-555. https: // doi.org/10.1111/joop.12022.
Liden, R. C, Wayne, S. J., Meuser, J. D., Hu, J., Wu, J., & Liao, C. (2015). Servant leadership: Validation of a short form of the SL-28. Leadership Quarterly, 26, 254-269. https://doi.org/ 10. 1016/j.leaqua.2014.12.002.
Liu, B., Hu, W., & Cheng, Y.-C. (2015). From the West to the East: Validating servant leadership in the Chinese public sector. Public Personnel Management 44(1), 25-45. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/ 0091026014555995.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education and Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.