Do First Language, Word Frequency and Input Matter in Bilingual’s Language Acquisition? -- A Corpus Study on the Acquisition of Third Person Singular by Bilingual Children

Yuning Wang

doi:10.54097/00pj2b85

Authors

Yuning Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/00pj2b85

Keywords:

Bilingualism, Corpus-Based Study, L1 Transfer, Third Person Singular Acquisition, Word Frequency

Abstract

The acquisition of morphosyntactic features, such as third-person singular (3SG) inflection, is a critical aspect of language development. While much research has focused on monolingual children’s acquisition of 3SG inflection, less is known about how bilingual children navigate this process, particularly those from non-inflectional first language (L1) backgrounds. Furthermore, two well established characteristics found in other bilingual groups: word frequency and L1 transfer are still remain unclear in the acquisition of 3SG inflection in Chinese-English bilingual groups. Addressing these gaps are crucial for understanding the unique challenges bilingual children face and the factors influencing their acquisition of English morphosyntatic feature. In this study, we employed corpus to analyze longitudinal naturalistic data from three Chinese-English bilingual children and one English monolingual child. We investigated the children’s use of 3SG inflection across obligatory contexts, examining the frequency of verb exposure in both parental input and a large corpus (COCA). Our results indicate that bilingual children, especially those from a non-inflectional L1 background, demonstrated delayed acquisition of 3SG inflection compared to monolingual counterparts. However, both groups showed better accuracy with high-frequency verbs, underscoring the importance of input frequency. Additionally, L1 transfer effects were evident in both monolingual children and bilingual children, with the bilingual children struggling more with verbs whose L1 lacked verb agreement. These findings suggest that both input frequency and L1 transfer play significant roles in shaping bilingual children’s acquisition of 3SG inflection. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of bilingual language development, with implications for language acquisition theory and educational practices, particularly in addressing the needs of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[2] Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). New York: Routledge.

[3] Blom, E., Paradis, J., & Duncan, T. S. (2012). Effects of input properties, vocabulary size, and L1 on the development of third person singular–s in child L2 English. Language Learning, 62(3), 965-994. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012. 00715.x.

[4] Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning,23, 95–123.

[5] Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 37–53.Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1974). NATURAL SEQUENCES IN CHILD SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION. Language Learning, 24(1), 37-53.

[6] Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164–194.

[7] Ellis, N. C. (2008). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associate learning of constructions, learned attention, and limited L2 endstate. In P.

[8] Gathercole, V. M., & Thomas, E. M. (2005). Minority language survival: Input factors influencing the acquisition of Welsh. In J. Cohen, K. T. McAlister, K. Rolstad, & J.

[9] MacSwan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on bilingualism (pp. 852–874). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

[10] Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372–405). New York: Routledge.

[11] Thorn, A., Gathercole, S., & Frankish, C. (2002). Language familiarity effects in short-term memory: The role of output delay and long-term knowledge. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 1363-1383.

[12] Jia, G., & Fuse, A. (2007). Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by native Mandarin-speaking children and adolescents: Age-related differences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1280–1299.https://doi. org/ 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/090).

[13] Jiang, N., Novokshanova, E., Masuda, K., & Wang, X. (2011). Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes. Language Learning, 61(3), 940-967. https:// doi. org/ 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00627.x.

[14] Kelly, N. (2017). The acquisition of the third person singular [-s]: A case study of language-minority children attending an Irish primary school. English Linguistics Research, 6(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v6n1p1.

[15] Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.

[16] Mai, Z. & Yip, V. (2017). Acquiring Chinese as a Heritage Language in English-speaking Countries and the Child Heritage Chinese Corpus. Paper presented at the International Conference on Bilingualism: Language and Heritage, Dec 18, Chinese University of Hong Kong.

[17] McDonald, J. (2000). Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(3), 395–423. https://doi.org/ 10. 1017/ S0142716400003064.

[18] Pica, T. (1983). Methods of morpheme quantification: Their effect on the interpretation of second language data. Studies in second language acquisition, 6(1), 69-78.

[19] Paradis, J. (2005). Grammatical morphology in children learning English as a second language: Implications of similarities with specifific language impairment. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, 36, 172–187.

[20] Paradis, J. (2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 213–237.

[21] Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. Developmental science, 6(5), 557–567. https:// doi. org/10.1111/1467-7687.00312.