Enterprise Lifecycle Management Strategies: Integration and Application of Professional Manager and Entrepreneurial Modes under Uncertainty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/x6qdfn28Keywords:
Enterprise Life Cycle, Mode Transformation Strategy, Professional Manager Model, Entrepreneur Model, Uncertainty, Economic Impact, Social Responsibility, Environmental Protection, Innovation Management, Policy SuggestionsAbstract
This paper reviews the enterprise under the condition of the life cycle and the uncertainty of model transformation strategy, analyses the model of managers and entrepreneurs is the combination of the impact on the enterprise management. With the acceleration of globalization and technological progress, the enterprise life cycle, increasing uncertainty in the model transformation strategy is widely used in various industries, to deal with complex dynamic market environment. By reviewing the development history of this strategy and its impact on economy, society and environment, this paper discusses how to balance innovation and efficiency to achieve sustainable development in the context of uncertainty. In view of the different life cycle stage and market uncertainty, puts forward the coping strategies from early stage to the downturn, and combined with case analysis at home and abroad and the actual effect. Finally, based on the evaluation results, this paper puts forward the policy recommendations of supporting innovation and transformation, in order to promote the flexibility of enterprise under uncertain environment and sustainable development.
Downloads
References
[1] Brown, T., & Mason, C. (2019). The role of entrepreneurial ecosystems in fostering entrepreneurship: A dynamic capabilities approach. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(9-10), 735-754.
[2] Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2020). Entrepreneurial opportunities: Who needs them? Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(3), 366-382.
[3] Lu, Y., Wang, R., & Xu, Z. (2019). Challenges and countermeasures of digital transformation in the age of intelligent manufacturing. Engineering, 5(4), 693-695.
[4] Nielsen, C., & Lund, M. (2018). Building scalable business models. Journal of Business Models, 6(1), 1-18.
[5] Agarwal, N., & Brem, A. (2021). Frugal innovation: A literature review and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 120763.
[6] Teece, D. J. (2021). A capability theory of the firm: An economics and (strategic) management perspective. New Zealand Economic Papers, 55(1), 1-43.
[7] Del Giudice, M., Scuotto, V., & Papa, A. (2019). Product innovation through industry 4.0 technologies in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 141-158.
[8] Kraus, S., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Schüssler, M. (2018). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research: Theoretical and practical perspective. Journal of Business Research, 89, 167-171.
[9] Zollo, M., & Meier, D. (2020). Strategic learning and knowledge management: Navigating the labyrinth of dynamic capabilities. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(2), 187-208.
[10] Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges, and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773.
[11] Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2020). Managing entrepreneurship under complexity: Adding more ways to think entrepreneurially. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(4), 509-522.
[12] Cucculelli, M., & Peruzzi, V. (2020). Innovation over the industry life-cycle: The role of entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Research, 107, 1-13.
[13] Li, S., & Zhu, H. (2018). Dynamic capabilities and organizational resilience in China’s digital economy. Management and Organization Review, 14(3), 649-676.
[14] Guo, H., Xu, E., & Jacobs, M. (2019). Managerial political ties and firm innovation: A study of Chinese listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 513-530.
[15] Carnes, C. M., Chirico, F., Hitt, M. A., & Pisano, V. (2018). Resource orchestration for innovation: Structuring and bundling resources in growth- and maturity-stage firms. Long Range Planning, 51(5), 675-690.
[16] Triguero, A., & Córcoles, D. (2021). Understanding innovation strategies in manufacturing firms: A multilevel approach. Technovation, 102, 102213.
[17] Jovanovic, T., & Peters, M. A. (2019). Digital governance in education: Data infrastructure, artificial intelligence, and critical policy analysis. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(7), 651-662.
[18] Feldman, E. R., & Mazmanian, M. (2020). Workplace technologies: New frontiers for research on organizational digital transformation. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 464-493.
[19] Wei, S., & Chen, Q. (2021). Strategic responses to institutional pressures for sustainability: The moderating effect of industry competition. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(3), 1291-1303.
[20] Brynjolfsson, E., & McElheran, K. (2018). Data in action: Data-driven decision making in US manufacturing. Management Science, 64(12), 5489-5508.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education and Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.