Supervision or Collusion? Common Institutional Ownership and Corporate R&D Manipulation

Authors

  • Hao Ding

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/jid.v3i2.9389

Keywords:

Common Institutional Ownership, R&D Manipulation, Synergistic Governance Effect, Collusive Fraud Effect

Abstract

R&D manipulation is a subjective manipulation of R&D accounting accounts by management that ignores the facts about R&D. It has a negative impact on the innovation performance of the company as well as the decision-making activities of external stakeholders. Hence, it is crucial to seek solutions to control this dishonest behaviour accurately. In recent years, the phenomenon of common institutional ownership has become increasingly widespread in the capital markets and has a significant impact on the strategic decisions of companies. There are currently two views on the corporate governance role of common institutional ownership: the synergistic governance effect and the collusive fraud effect. This paper selects Chinese A-share listed firms from 2009-2021 as a research sample to examine the impact of common institutional ownership on corporate R&D manipulation. The study found that common institutional ownership can inhibit corporate R&D manipulation. The higher the degree of their linkage and the greater the shareholding, the more pronounced the synergistic effect. The findings remained valid after testing using propensity score matching (PSM) and changing the sample period. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the inhibiting effect of common institutional ownership on corporate R&D manipulation is more pronounced in high-tech firms and firms which stay in the growth and maturity stage. This paper enriches the research on the economic consequences of common institutional ownership and provides management implications for implementing the innovation-driven strategy in China.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acharya, V., & Xu, Z.X. (2017). Financial Dependence and Innovation: The Case of Public versus Private Firms, 124(2), 223-243. https://doi.10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.02.010.

Azar, J., Schmalz, M.C., & Tecu, I. (2018). Anticompetitive Effects of Common Ownership. Journal of Finance,73(4), 1513-1565. https://doi.10.1111/jofi.12698.

Bennett, B., Bettis, J.C., Gopalan, R., & Milbourn, T. (2017). Compensation Goals and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 124(2), 307-330. https://doi. 10. 1016/j. jfineco. 2017.01.010.

Bereskin, F.L., Hsu, P.H., & Rotenberg, W. (2018). The Real Effects of Real Earnings Management: Evidence from Innovation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(1), 525-557. https://doi.10.1111/1911-3846.12376.

Bianchini, S., & Pellegrino, G. (2019). Innovation Persistence and Employment Dynamics. Research Policy, 48(5), 1171-1186. https://doi.10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.008.

Brooks, C., Chen, Z. & Zeng, Y.Q. (2018). Institutional Cross-ownership and Corporate Strategy: The Case of Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance,48, 187-216. https://doi.10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.11.003.

Bushman, R.M., Piotroski, J.D. & Smith, A.J. (2004). What Determines Corporate Transparency? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(2), 207-252. https://doi.10.1111/j.1475-679X. 2004. 00136.x.

Chan, L., Chen, K. C.W., Chen, T.Y., Yu, Y.X. (2015). Substitution between Real and Accruals-Based Earnings Management after Voluntary Adoption of Compensation Clawback Provisions. Accounting Review, 90(1), 147-174. https://doi.10.2308/accr-50862.

Chan, L.H., Chen, K C W., Chen, T Y. (2013). The Effects of Firm-initiated Clawback Provisions on Bank Loan Contracting, 110(3), 659-679. https://doi.10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.08.010.

Chen, X., Cheng, Q., Lo, A.K., Wang, X. (2016). CEO Contractual Protection and Managerial Short-Termism. Accounting Review, 90(5), 1871-1906. https://doi. 10.2308/ accr-51033.

Chen, Y.Y., Li, Q.Y., Ng, J. & Wang, C. (2021). Corporate Financing of Investment Opportunities in a World of Institutional Cross-ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 69, 102041. https://doi.10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102041.

Clausen, T.H., & Pohjola, M. (2013). Persistence of Product Innovation: Comparing Breakthrough and Incremental Product Innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(4), 369-385. https://doi. 10. 1080/ 09537325. 2013. 774344.

Cortes, F. (2021). Firm Opacity and the Opportunity Cost of Cash. Journal of Corporate Finance, 68, 101923. https:// doi. 10. 1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101923.

Dyck, A., Morse, A. & Zingales, L. (2010). Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud?, Journal of Finance, 65(6): 2213-2253. https://doi.10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01614.x.

Frenz, M., & Prevezer, M. (2012). What Can CIS Data Tell Us about Technological Regimes and Persistence of Innovation? Industry and Innovation, 19(4), 285-306. https://doi. 10.1080/ 13662716.2012.694676.

Gao, K. J., Shen, H.X., Gao, X., & Chan, K.C. (2019). The Power of Sharing: Evidence from Institutional Investor Cross-ownership and Corporate Innovation.International Review of Economics and Finance, (63):284-296. https://doi.10. 1016/ j.iref.2019.01.008.

Gilje, E.P., Gormley, T. A., & Levit, D. (2020). Who’s Paying Attention? Measuring Common Ownership and Its Impact on Managerial Incentives. Journal of Financial Economics,137(1), 152-178. https://doi.10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.12.006.

Gomber, P., Kauffman, R. J., Parker, C. & Weber, B. (2018). On the Fintech Revolution: Interpreting the Forces of Innovation, Disruption, and Transformation in Financial Services, Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 220-265. https://doi.10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766.

Gunny, K.A. (2010). The Relation Between Earnings Management Using Real Activities Manipulation and Future Performance: Evidence from Meeting Earnings Benchmarks. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3), 855. https:// doi. 10. 1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01029.x.

He, J., & Huang, J.K. (2017). Product Market Competition in a World of Cross-Ownership: Evidence from Institutional Blockholdings. Review of Financial Studies, 30(8), 2674-2718. https://doi.10.1093/rfs/hhx028.

Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12112.

Kang, J. K., Luo, J., & Na, H.S. (2018). Are Institutional Investors with Multiple Blockholdings Effective Monitors. Journal of Financial Economics,128(3), 576-602. https://doi. 10. 1016/j.jfineco.2018.03.005.

Kim, P. H., Wiltermuth, S. S., & Newman, D. T. (2021). A Theory of Ethical Accounting and its Implications for Hypocrisy in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 172-191. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0161.

Koch, A., Panayides, M., & Thomas, S. (2021). Common Ownership and Competition in Product Markets. Journal of Financial Economics,139(1), 109-137. https://doi.10. 1016/j. jfineco. 2020.07.007.

Koh, S., Durand, R., Dai, L.L., & Chang, M. (2015). Financial Distress: Lifecycle and Corporate Restructuring. Journal of Corporate Finance, 33, 19-33. https://doi. 10. 1016/ j.jcorpfin.2015.04.004.

Kothari, S.P., Mizik, N., & Roychowdhury, S. (2016). Managing for the Moment: The Role of Earnings Management via Real Activities versus Accruals in SEO Valuation. Accounting Review, 91(2), 559-586. https://doi.10.2308/accr-51153.

Le Bas, C., Mothe, C., Nguyen-Thi, T.U. (2015). The Differentiated Impacts of Organizational Innovation Practices on Technological Innovation Persistence. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(1), 110. https://doi. 10. 1108/ EJIM-09-2012-0085.

Lim, K.S., Hahn, Y.H., & Yu, P.I. (2004). Technological Competition in Network Markets with Policy Implications. Technovation, 24(9), 721-728. https://doi.10.1016/S0166-4972 (02)00166-9.

Liu, D.Y., Chen, T., Liu, X.Y, & Yu, Y.Z. (2019). Do More Subsidies Promote Greater Innovation? Evidence from the Chinese Electronic Manufacturing Industry, Economic Modelling, 80, 441-452. https://doi.10. 1016/j. econmod. 2018. 11.027.

Liu, H., Xing, F., Li, B., & Yakshtas, K. (2021). Does the High-tech Enterprise Certification Policy Promote Innovation in China? Science and Public Policy, 47(5), 678-688. https:// doi. 10. 1093/scipol/scaa050.

Melnyk, S.A., Ritchie, W.J., & Calantone, R.J. (2014). The Case of the C-TPAT Border Security Initiative: Assessing the Adoption/Persistence Decisions When Dealing With a Novel, Institutionally Driven Administrative Innovation. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(4), 289-300. https:// doi. 10. 1111/ jbl.12027.

Nardi, L. (2022). The Corporate Social Responsibility Price Premium as an Enabler of Substantive CSR. Academy of Management Review, 47(2), 282-308. https:// doi.org/ 10. 5465 / amr.2019.0425.

Osma, B.G. (2008). Board Independence and Real Earnings Management: The Case of R&D Expenditure. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(2), 116-131. https:// doi. 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00672.x.

Overland, C., & Samani, N. (2021). The Sheep Watching the Shepherd: Employee Representation on the Board and Earnings Quality. European Accounting Review, 31(5), 1299-1336. https://doi.10.1080/09638180.2021.1919169.

Papageorgiou, H., Pentaris, F., Theodorou, E., Vardaki, M., & Petrakos, M. (2001). A Statistical Metadata Model for Simultaneous Manipulation of Both Data and Metadata. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 17(2), 169-192. https:// doi.10.1023/A:1012805713392.

Poonawala, S.H., & Nagar, N. (2018). Gross Profit Manipulation through Classification Shifting. Journal of Business Research, 94, 81-88. https://doi. 10. 1016/j. jbusres. 2018. 09.013.

Ramalingegowda, S., Utke, S., & Yu Y. (2020). Common Institutional Ownership and Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(1), 208-241. https:// doi. 10. 1111/1911-3846.12628.

Salinas, E., Seideman, J.A., Stanford, T.R. (2018). When the Simplest Voluntary Decisions Appear Patently Suboptimal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, e240. https:// doi. 10. 1017/ S0140525X18001474.

Sasaki, T. (2017). Pension Accrual Management and Research and Development Investment. Accounting & Finance, 57(4), 1127-1147. https://doi.10.1111/acfi.12185.

Schmalz, M.C. (2018). Common-Ownership Concentration and Corporate Conduct. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 10(10), 413-448. https://doi.10.1146/annurev-financial- 110217-022747.

Shi, J.H., Zhu, X.L. (2021). Potential Impacts of Foreign Divestment on China’s High-tech Manufacturing Industry: a General Equilibrium Model-based Analysis. Applied Economics Letters, 30(2), 205-209. https:// doi. 10. 1080/ 1350 4851. 2021.1982127.

Shea, C. T., & Hawn, O. V. (2019). Microfoundations of Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1609-1642. https://doi/ 10. 5465/ amj.2014.0795.

Sun, E.Y. (2021). The Differential Role of R&D and SG &A for Earnings Management and Stock Price Manipulation. Contemporary Accounting Research. https://doi. 10. 1111/ 1911 -3846.12634.

Tian, B.B., Yu, B.X., Chen, S., & Ye, J.J. (2021). Tax Incentive, R&D Investment and Firm Innovation: Evidence from China. Journal of Asian Economics, 71, 101245. https:// doi. 10. 1016/ j. asieco. 2020.101245.

Triguero, A., Corcoles, D., & Cuerva, M.C. (2014). Persistence of Innovation and Firm’s Growth: Evidence from a Panel of SME and Large Spanish Manufacturing Firms. Small Business Economics, 43(4), 787-804. https://doi. 10.1007/ s11187-014-9562-8.

Walter, S.G., Walter, A., & Mueller, D. (2020). Formalization, Communication Quality, and Opportunistic Behavior in R&D Alliances between Competitors. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 954-970. https://doi.10.1111/jpim.12209.

Wang, Y., Stuart, T. & Li, J. (2021). Fraud and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(2): 267-297. https://doi. 10.1177/0001839220927350.

Zhou, K. Z., Gao, G.Y. & Zhao, H. (2017). State Ownership and Firm Innovation in China: An Integrated View of Institutional and Efficiency Logics, Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2):375-404. https://doi.10. 1177/ 00018392166 74457.

Downloads

Published

30-05-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ding, H. (2023). Supervision or Collusion? Common Institutional Ownership and Corporate R&D Manipulation. Journal of Innovation and Development, 3(2), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.54097/jid.v3i2.9389