ETM: A Method for Measuring Urban Vitality based on Entropy Topsis Model

Authors

  • Saijie Wang
  • Sirui Wang
  • Zhuoran Zhang
  • Xinying Li
  • Yixuan Zhao
  • Lei Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/cw257g87

Keywords:

Urban vitality, TOPSIS, Carbon emissions, Entropy approach, Nuclear density analysis.

Abstract

Urban vitality is one of the key indicators of urban development, and it is crucial for assessing cities’ quality and guiding urban planning. However, most of the previous studies focused on the impact of economic problems to evaluate the urban vitality, ignoring other factors. Therefore, the depiction of urban vitality often fails to adequately reflect the level of urban development. This paper builds an evaluation index system of urban vitality based on four factors: society, economy, culture, and envi-ronment. Then we analyze the spatial distribution characteristics combined with ETM (Entropy Top-sis Model). Take Beijing for example, the feasibility of the model is verified by using GDP data, and it concludes that the vitality shows a circular distribution pattern of “high in the center and low in the periphery”. Experimental analysis is performed to show that one single economic indicator for evaluating the suburbs vitality, while a comprehensive vitality indicator for the urban areas is more suitable to a relatively complex development structure.

References

[1] Lu Y, Zhang Y, Cao X, et al. Forty years of reform and opening up: China’s progress toward a sustainable path[J]. Science Advances, 2019, 5(8): eaau9413.

[2] Liu H, Gou P, Xiong J. Vital triangle: A new concept to evaluate urban vitality[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2022, 98: 101886.

[3] Lan F, Gong X, Da H, et al. How do population inflow and social infrastructure affect urban vitality? Evidence from 35 large- and medium-sized cities in China[J]. Cities, 2020, 100: 102454.

[4] Liu S, Zhang L, Long Y, et al. A New Urban Vitality Analysis and Evaluation Framework Based on Human Activity Modeling Using Multi-Source Big Data[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2020, 9(11): 617.

[5] Fan Z, Duan J, Luo M, et al. How Did Built Environment Affect Urban Vitality in Urban Waterfronts? A Case Study in Nanjing Reach of Yangtze River[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2021, 10(9): 611.

[6] Yi Y, Wang Y, Li Y, et al. Impact of urban density on carbon emissions in China[J]. Applied Economics, 2021, 53(53): 6153-6165.

[7] Li Y, Fei T, Zhang F. A regionalization method for clustering and partitioning based on trajectories from NLP perspective[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2019, 33(12): 2385-2405.

[8] Kobashi T, Yoshida T, Yamagata Y, et al. On the potential of “Photovoltaics + Electric vehicles” for deep decarbonization of Kyoto’s power systems: Techno-economic-social considerations[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 275: 115419.

[9] Daniels L K. Rapid in-office and in-vivo desensitization of an injection phobia utilizing hypnosis[J]. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 1976, 18(3): 200-203.

[10] Montgomery J. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design[J]. Journal of Urban Design, 1998, 3(1): 93-116.

[11] Ye Y, Li D, Liu X. How block density and typology affect urban vitality: an exploratory analysis in Shenzhen, China[J]. Urban Geography, 2018, 39(4): 631-652.

Downloads

Published

26-05-2025

Issue

Section

Articles