Research on Fetal Chromosome Abnormality Risk in NIPT Based on Multivariate Nonlinear Modeling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/tvf15w46Keywords:
Chromosome Abnormality Risk, Nonlinear Programming, Multivariate Polynomial Regression, Decision Tree, Prenatal Screening.Abstract
This study addresses key challenges in fetal chromosomal abnormality risk assessment for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by establishing an integrated analytical framework combining multivariate nonlinear modeling and machine learning. The innovative contributions of this research are highlighted in several aspects: For male fetuses, a novel trivariate cubic polynomial regression model was developed to precisely quantify the complex nonlinear relationships among Y-chromosome concentration, gestational age, and maternal BMI, with a joint optimization algorithm determining personalized testing time windows—overcoming limitations of existing methods in dynamic prediction and timing selection. For female fetuses, an anomaly identification model integrating ADASYN oversampling and decision trees was constructed, effectively addressing data imbalance through multi-dimensional feature selection and significantly enhancing classification performance in the absence of Y-chromosome reference. Overall, the proposed gender-specific modeling strategy provides a more precise and personalized screening solution for clinical practice. Validation on a clinical dataset of 1,056 male and 605 female fetal cases demonstrates that this framework significantly improves risk prediction accuracy and offers an effective tool for optimizing prenatal screening strategies.
References
[1]Yu Dandan, Li Fengjin, Yao Xinyu, et al. Efficacy analysis of NIPT in detecting common fetal chromosomal aneuploidy abnormalities in different cautious populations [J]. Chinese Journal of Family Planning and Gynecotokology, 2025, (03): 72-76+82.
[2]Zhang Liangliang, Zhuo Zhaozhen, Huang Shengwen, et al. Comparative analysis of the application value of NIPT and NIPT-plus in prenatal screening [J]. Guizhou Medical Journal, 2025, (06): 942-944.
[3]Zheng Haiyan, Wu Yanhong, Zhang Xin, et al. Significance of NIPT in prenatal screening for chromosomal abnormalities and classification of high-risk Z-values [J]. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 2023, (12): 1843-1848.
[4]Chen Qiang. Improvement and positioning application of differential evolution algorithm [J]. Beidou and Spatial Information Application Technology, 2025, (03): 28-31.
[5]Chen Xiang, Yang Zhiqiang, Yang Bing, et al. Application of LOESS in noise identification and extraction of GNSS vertical coordinate time series [J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2021, (10): 1024-1029.
[6]Hu L, Pei Y, Luo X, et al. A multivariate modeling method for the prediction of low fetal fraction before noninvasive prenatal testing[J]. Science Progress, 2021, 104(4): 00368504211052359.
[7]Zhou Y, Zhu Z, Gao Y, et al. Effects of maternal and fetal characteristics on cell-free fetal DNA fraction in maternal plasma[J]. Reproductive Sciences, 2015, 22(11): 1429-1435.
[8]Becking E C, Scheffer P G, Henrichs J, et al. Fetal fraction of cell-free DNA in noninvasive prenatal testing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide retrospective cohort study of 56,110 pregnant women[J]. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024, 231(2): 244. e1-244. e18.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jianuo Wu, Zhenglin Wang, Xinyuan Qiao

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







