A Study on the Impact Pathways and Heterogeneous Effects of Carbon Pricing on Corporate Green Transformation Based on the Multi-Period Double Difference Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/rersn846Keywords:
Carbon pricing, Green transformation, Difference-in-differences.Abstract
Using a multi-period difference-in-differences approach and a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2020, this study systematically examines the transmission channels and heterogeneous effects of carbon pricing on corporate green transformation. Findings reveal that rising carbon prices significantly accelerate corporate green transformation through a “mandatory” mechanism, with this effect being more pronounced in state-owned enterprises and high-carbon emission industries. Mechanism tests indicate that carbon pricing indirectly drives transformation via three pathways: incentivizing green innovation, alleviating financing constraints, and enhancing environmental information transparency. This study offers innovation and significance in the following dimensions: Theoretically, it extends the “Porter Hypothesis” to market-based environmental regulation, revealing the micro-incentive logic of carbon pricing. Methodologically, it constructs a multi-period DID model with interaction terms for intensity variables to enhance causal identification precision. Policy-wise, it provides empirical evidence for designing differentiated carbon markets and supporting green initiatives in private enterprises, offering valuable insights for achieving China's dual carbon goals.
References
[1]Jie X, Han Y. How can local manufacturing enterprises achieve a “gorgeous transformation” through green innovation?—A multi-case study based on the attention-based view[J]. Management World, 2022, 38(03): 76-106.
[2]Kroh J, Schultz C. In favor or against: The influence of skeptical stakeholders in urban innovation projects for green transformation[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2023, 41(7): 102515.
[3]Lu H, Li F, Lu J, et al. Equity pledge and corporate green transformation: The moderating role of firm characteristics and government behavior[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2023, 40(07): 79-90.
[4]Gong X, Du J. Digital economy, green innovation and enterprises’ green total factor productivity[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2024, 40(02): 35-40.
[5]Wu Y, Qi J, Xian Q, et al. The carbon emission reduction effect of China’s carbon market: From the perspective of synergistic effects between market mechanisms and administrative intervention[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2021, (08): 114-132.
[6]Hu J, Fang Q, Long W. Carbon emission regulation, corporate emission-reduction incentives and total factor productivity: A natural experiment based on China’s emissions trading scheme[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2023, 58(04): 77-94.
[7]Xue F, Zhou M.-L. The emission reduction effect of the scale of China’s carbon trading market[J]. East China Economic Management, 2021, 35(06): 11-21.
[8]Shi J, Cai H, Tang L, et al. The impact of the carbon trading mechanism on China’s economy and environment: Based on a CGE model[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(S1): 801-806.
[9]Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2014, 35(1), 1–23.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zhipeng Yang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







