Research on an Early Detection Method for Residential Indoor Fires Based on the LSTM-FNN Algorithm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/mq6n6g79Keywords:
Indoor fire; LSTM-FNN; Early detection; Information fusion; Temporal featuresAbstract
To address the issues of delayed response and high false alarm/miss rates in traditional residential indoor fire detection methods, an LSTM-FNN model integrating Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Fuzzy Neural Network (FNN) was developed to enable early identification of smoldering and flaming fire stages. The model utilizes the LSTM module to extract temporal dynamic features of smoke, carbon monoxide concentration, and temperature. It combines the FNN module to handle feature uncertainty and incorporates an attention mechanism for feature selection. Standard fire scenarios were constructed using Pyrosim software to generate training data. A physical experimental platform was established to comprehensively validate the model's early warning capability and generalization performance. Results demonstrate that the LSTM-FNN model achieves remarkably low Mean Squared Error (MSE) values of 0.0009, 0.0002, and 0.0002 during no-fire, smoldering, and flaming phases, respectively. Its Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) metrics significantly outperform standalone models. Validation experiments on typical combustibles—beech wood, cotton rope, polyurethane, and n-heptane—confirm its effective capture of early-stage fire characteristics. This method offers superior early warning timeliness compared to traditional approaches, significantly reducing false alarm and missed detection rates while enhancing the timeliness and reliability of early fire detection.
References
[1] Hikmat Y, Ahmad Z K, Min U F U, et al. A modified YOLOv5 architecture for efficient fire detection in smart cities[J].Expert Systems With Applications,2023,231DOI:10.1016/J.ESWA.2023.120465.
[2] Pincott J, Tien P W, Wei S, et al. Indoor fire detection utilizing computer vision-based strategies[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 61: 105154.
[3] Khan F, Xu Z, Sun J, et al. Recent advances in sensors for fire detection[J]. Sensors, 2022, 22(9): 3310.
[4] Jin C, Wang T, Alhusaini N, et al. Video fire detection methods based on deep learning: Datasets, methods, and future directions[J]. Fire, 2023, 6(8): 315.
[5] Wang H, Shi Y, Chen L, et al. A Tunnel Fire Detection Method Based on an Improved Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory[J]. Sensors, 2024, 24(19): 6455.
[6] Vasconcelos R N, Franca Rocha W J S, Costa D P, et al. Fire detection with deep learning: A comprehensive review[J]. Land, 2024, 13(10): 1696.
[7] Diaconu B M. Recent advances and emerging directions in fire detection systems based on machine learning algorithms[J]. Fire, 2023, 6(11): 441.
[8] Liu P, Xiang P, Lu D. A new multi-sensor fire detection method based on LSTM networks with environmental information fusion[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2023, 35(36): 25275-25289.
[9] Xu Z, Guo Y, Saleh J H. Advances toward the next generation fire detection: Deep LSTM variational autoencoder for improved sensitivity and reliability[J]. Ieee Access, 2021, 9: 30636-30653.
[10] Park S H, Kim D H, Kim S C. Recognition of IoT-based fire-detection system fire-signal patterns applying fuzzy logic[J]. Heliyon, 2023, 9(2).
[11] Rao G N, Rao P J, Duvvuru R, et al. Neural fuzzy system design in forest fire detection[J]. Microsystem Technologies, 2024, 30(4): 455-467.
[12] Khandoker M A R, Mou R J, Muntaha M A, et al. Numerical simulation of fire in a multistoried ready-made garments factory using PyroSim[C]//AIP conference proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC, 2018, 1980(1): 050026.
[13] Xu M, Peng D. Pyrosim-based numerical simulation of fire safety and evacuation behaviour of college buildings[J]. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 2020, 10(2): 293-299.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hongyang Li, Jun Li

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







