A Study of Elite Education in Chinese International High Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v17i.10477Keywords:
Elite education, International schools, Meritocracy.Abstract
The article examines the meaning of elite and elite education, as well as the characteristics of elite schools in China. Elite schools are institutions that offer education to a small number of predominantly middle or upper-class students. The admissions process for these schools is competitive and costly, resulting in a majority of middle- or upper-class pupils. The schools are also distinguished by the acquisition of cultural capital, a resource that embodies or generates cultural worth. Due to the lack of cultural capital, students from lower socioeconomic origins are excluded from top universities. In addition, the piece discusses the effects of tiny class sizes in top institutions, which are touted as a way to provide each student individualised attention. Yet, the effect of class size on student progress is dependent on instructional strategies. The article claimed that elite education has caused a vicious cycle of increased educational inequality, which has widened the gap between socioeconomic classes.
Downloads
References
Gaztambide-Fernández, R. What Is an Elite Boarding School? Review of Educational Research, 2009, 79(3), 1090–1128.
Maxwell, C., & Aggleton, P. Researching elite education: affectively inferred belongings, desires and exclusions. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 2015, 28(9), 1065–1080.
Bourdieu, P. Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. Knowledge, education, and cultural change. Routledge. 2018, 71-112.
Ermisch, J., & Francesconi, M. Family Matters: Impacts of Family Background on Educational Attainments. Economica, 2001, 68(270), 137–156.
Liu, S. Neoliberalism, Globalization, and “Elite” Education in China. 2020.
Throsby, D. Cultural capital. Handbook of Cultural Economics, Third Edition, 2020, 168–173.
Reay, D. Education and cultural capital: the implications of changing trends in education policies. Cultural Trends, 2004, 13(2), 73–86.
Meng, H., Tang, M., & Wu, M. Current Situation on Exam-Oriented Education in China and the Outlook for Quality-Oriented Education. Www.atlantis-Press.com; Atlantis Press, 2021.
Pedder, D. Are small classes better? Understanding relationships between class size, classroom processes and pupils’ learning. Oxford Review of Education, 2006, 32(2), 213–234.
Scully, M. A. Meritocracy. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 2015, 2, 1–2.
Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. Class inequality and meritocracy: a critique of Saunders and an alternative analysis1. The British Journal of Sociology, 1999, 50(1), 1–27.
Bell, D. Meritocracy and Equality - ProQuest. Www.proquest.com. 1972.
Halvorsen, P. A sense of unease: elite high school students negotiating historical privilege. Journal of Youth Studies, 2020, 1–16.
Young, N. A. E. Departing from the beaten path: international schools in China as a response to discrimination and academic failure in the Chinese educational system. Comparative Education, 2017, 54(2), 159–180.
Jawad, N. A. M. M. Bilingual Education: Features & Advantages. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2021, 12(5), 735–740.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






